Have you seen today's xkcd?
What the fuck was he thinking when drawing a comic like that? It is made of ONE WORD. THE FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE, THREAD OVER and FAIL.
It's an insult to EXPERT PROGRAMMERS everywhere. To add insult to injury, when you mouseover the image, a comment detailing ONE WORD. THE FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE, THREAD OVER pops up, saying ONE WORD. THE FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE, THREAD OVER is "wonderful". I don't know about you, /prog/, but I am NEVER reading this ``BULSHITE" again. It seems the Abelson is out not just for SICP, but for the WHOLE WORLD.
>>38
That's okay, Python can be pretty confusing
:*
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-10 0:08
btw, guys. That's a public account that I posted to the xkcd forums with.
username: cypherpunk
password: cypherpunk
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-10 0:36
Every time A COP get a robber in the process, you will hear the robber say.. Stupid cop caught me. but who is really the stupid?
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-10 8:12
As for you, mister, you need to learn that your path to satori is one of many. The Abelson has seen this, and is moving forward with new revelations. Do you intend to dismiss too the wisdom found by Knuth? The incursion into the works and ways of the world by the quadrune CLRS? Would you argue PAIP to be some sort of deception, leading the faithful astray? If so, you're a fool. No worse than the servants of Enterprise.
>>48
Why should I believe you, or follow a link from someone in their first 10 posts? Why is that book worth reading? What does SICP stand for?
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-12 3:41
>>53
That's why I stopped being a member of the XKCD community.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-06 11:39
The parser could be justified as a language where productivity was proportional with lines of code this is what I attacked in my previous posts whether the bind etc functions You might as well Not very compatible if you ask the right questions and look through to these 5?