forced_anon chat
1
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-04 23:50
Imagine this: you load up a 4chan chat page, and you're connected to another user to chat one on one. Completely at random, with no traces of identity whatsoever. That's it. There could be a button to get a new person if you really don't like who you're talking to or you've seen them before, or you could just hit F5. In the true spirit of Anonymous, you could talk about anything in complete freedom.
361
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 4:41
definitely needs a BEL when you switch partners
362
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 4:43
Fuck, some faggot was going on and on about 'fuck microsoft this' 'I use linux that'.
363
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 4:47
you can also fix the linefeed/cr issue in putty by checking "implicit CR in every LF" under Change Settings/Terminal
364
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 4:48
>>254
forgive him, raptor jesus, he knows not what he asks.
365
Name:
Anonymous 2007-12-20 4:53
sure why not i want
366
Name:
Anon
2007-12-20 5:09
fags
367
Name:
Anonymous 2007-12-20 5:11
Stop bumping your shitthread OP & Erlangfag.
368
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 5:15
Is OP still around? Flood protection needs to be implemented.
369
Name:
Anonymous 2007-12-20 5:28
AM offering use of my domain as a hostname for chat. email in the box.
370
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 5:29
FAGS KILL YOURSELVES!
371
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 5:36
>>369
enjoy your bestiality porn spam
372
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 5:43
Connected with a telnet MUD client. Separate text area.
373
Name:
anon. 2007-12-20 5:48
so who in here fucks there sis
374
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 5:54
lolwut
375
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 5:56
hola
376
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 6:10
m00
377
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 6:11
>>369
No, an IP is more anonymous and fits well in the style of anonchat.
(Yes, there's AnonChat.com, I know...)
378
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 6:18
>>53
The telecommunications industry also relies on STREAMS
379
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 6:19
FUCK
380
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 6:49
Enjoy your aids
381
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 6:50
It was a bad idea enticing the hordes of /b/ into /prog/.
382
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 6:56
>>381
yeah, thread is over
383
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 6:57
>>381
Not quite. I had no idea /prog/ even existed I would have been here months ago.
first post:
>>378
384
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 7:01
a bay bay fyuckj me
385
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 7:08
lol
386
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 10:59
i did cat /dev/urandom | nc -vv 213.10.200.234 20656
387
Name:
Anonymous 2007-12-20 13:38
This is why we don't post /prog/ to /b/. Next time post the instructions only, not the URL, retards.
388
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 15:17
>>387
HUGE SUCCESS
We now have like 40+ users on constantly
389
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 15:20
>>388
/prog/ is the only textboard with a regular userbase, we don't need other guys.
390
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 15:27
I bet the admin is logging all the chats
391
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 15:33
Damn it, I was connected to a bot and confessed to a crime before I realised what I was talking to.
392
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-20 15:35
I bet they're all bots talking to each other. Anonymously.
393
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-21 0:53
the hell is everyone
394
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-21 0:57
>>393
Yes. That's the endgame of Anonymous.
395
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-21 1:01
fuck. I'm bored. I want someone random to talk to.
396
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-21 2:19
>>395
advertise it in /b/. DO
NOT mention
/prog/
397
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-21 17:47
>>2
Except you could be connected with OP.
Fixed.
398
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-22 21:52
Number of people connected: 1
399
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-22 22:34
>>398
make a thread in /b/.
This has potential, we got 60 users on at one point.
400
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-23 7:08
TURN IT BACK ON!
Newer Posts