forced_anon chat
1
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-04 23:50
Imagine this: you load up a 4chan chat page, and you're connected to another user to chat one on one. Completely at random, with no traces of identity whatsoever. That's it. There could be a button to get a new person if you really don't like who you're talking to or you've seen them before, or you could just hit F5. In the true spirit of Anonymous, you could talk about anything in complete freedom.
241
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 9:20
>>238
That's a very good point. In most social situations, group dynamics are different to one-on-one.
I think this would be interesting if it was limited to a small number of people, like 3 or 4.
242
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 16:11
You're all missing the original point of this idea. The OP's point was that even /b/tards stop acting like meme-sprouting fucktards when in a one on one chat. Insert more people in that equation and you'll just get Habbo or IRC.
243
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-15 19:31
Changelog:
* Added better /next support (you'll never get the same person twice in one session).
* Added /ping command to send a BEL.
* Removed timeout.
* Removed showing IP on server console (except for bans).
Server: nc 213.10.200.234 20656
Sauce:
http://pastebin.cz/show/2675
244
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-15 22:28
>>243
Can we get a BEL when someone else connects to you as well? You know, for those times when no one's on and you leave the terminal open waiting for someone to pop up.
245
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-17 3:59
bump.
246
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-17 5:27
>>244
No, but we can get a RHEL.
247
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-17 5:32
>>243
Thanks for posting the code. It's a really interesting read to see a working program in Erlang that's small enough to get a grip on but large enough to not be completely trivial.
248
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-17 6:23
>>246
Is it possible we could get a REPL?
249
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-18 9:57
No-one's using it any more :(
250
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-18 12:08
>>249
Erlang in a nutshell.
251
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-18 12:49
One-on-one chat is retarded anyway.
252
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-18 14:32
damn, too late
253
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-18 18:59
Fatal error! Message could not be posted.
254
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-18 19:03
>>249
make a thread in /b/, that's how we got some anons on it
255
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 3:28
I sure hope post numbers aren't stored in a char.
256
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 3:35
write it in brainfuck
257
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 4:17
258
Name:
Anonymous 2007-12-19 4:57
>>255
>>257
It's all the same in toy languages anyway.
259
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 5:41
>>255
I see what you did there.
260
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 6:46
im being told eggs are inferior beings
261
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 6:52
FROSTED BUTTS!!
262
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 6:53
Nobody here. Now go home.
263
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 7:10
wtf?
264
Name:
duh
2007-12-19 7:19
1 on 1 SUxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
265
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 7:23
266
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 7:26
Hey guys I got an idea.
267
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 7:32
"Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
268
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 8:48
How does this shit work? I ran across the thread on /b/, and I'm trying to do this right. What's the point of /echo, lets them get my messages, yes? Do they receive my messages without it? Because it didn't seem like it.
269
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 9:08
>>268
/echo is so you receive your own messages. The other will always recieve your messages.
Use a client like netcat or PuTTY (in raw mode) so you don't send your typos and backspaces, but just the line without typos. You may need to set Terminal->Local line editing in PuTTY.
Breaking your messages can't be fixed on the server (it's a client side problem). If you don't like the other, use /next. With PuTTY you can limit the amount of bells (Terminal->Bell).
270
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 9:13
This project is a good idea indeed. Much like meeting people on a bus or something, like someone said. I just had a very amusing discussion that unbored me for a few minutes with another anon.
271
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 9:42
Shittiest idea ever.
272
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 9:44
omigod. let's do this. i suggest we call it fourchan!
273
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 9:58
Number of people connected: 21
274
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 10:12
FROSTED BUTTS!!
275
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 10:19
What kind of limits are there on message size? ASCII art sometimes gets cut in half on the larger ones =(
276
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-19 10:46
This is rediculous.
277
Name:
Anonymous 2007-12-19 11:44
278
Name:
Anonymous 2007-12-19 11:44
wahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahhahahahahahah
279
Name:
Anonymous 2007-12-19 11:45
wahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahhahahahahahah
280
Name:
Anonymous 2007-12-19 11:45
wahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahahahahhahahahahahah
Newer Posts