Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Common Lisp is too hard.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-04 19:06

I still can't get my head around prefix notation. I heard Scheme is easier though. Seriously, why do practitioners of Lisp-like languages claim it's so good? I honestly cannot see the big deal, it's an old, slow, awkward and overall clunky language to use.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-04 19:16

>>2
How about giving arguments other then "lol read sicp." Explain, what's so good about CLisp/Scheme? If it's so good, why aren't more projects written in it? Today, it's all Java, C++, C, or one of the .NET languages. As far as I know, people only use the Lisp-like languages for small, shell-type tasks / cgi scripts, and even then there are far more suitable languages available (Python, Perl, etc.)

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List