What languages does /prog/ know?
1
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-03 22:54
Where ``knowing'' a language is to mean being able to write a program in said language without the need for external reference.
81
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 18:10
82
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 19:13
Javascript and Actionscrtip are the exact same language (ECMAScript), just different dialects. See just different dialects. different
83
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 19:14
>>82
different dialects.
dialects.
84
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 19:16
>>83
different dialects.
different
In the same way scheme is not common lisp
85
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 19:17
>>84
In the same way Scheme and Common lisp are both LISP.
86
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 19:20
>>85
In the same way JavaScript and ActionScript are both ECMAScript dialects.
87
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 20:21
>>86
ECMAScript dialects.
dialects.
.
88
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 20:30
Lisp is not a programming language, CL is, scheme is.
89
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 20:46
>>47
Lisp is laughable, and so are the fags that use it thinking they're fucking hardcore programmers.
90
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 21:14
>>89 is laughable, and so are the fags that think they're fucking hardcore programmers.
91
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 21:19
>>90
disregard that, I BAWWWW when people diss Lisp.
92
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 21:30
>>88
We're going around in circles. Let's just agree to disagree, and call it a stalemate.
93
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-05 21:36
ECMAScript is not a programming language, Javascript is, ActionScript is.
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-262.pdf
ECMAScript is an object-oriented programming language for performing computations and manipulating computational objects within a host environment.
94
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-06 4:06
bytecode
95
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-06 19:52
Know well:
96
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 2:00
c
97
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 5:10
itt fags that list diffrent flavors of the same basic language
98
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 5:12
>>97
basic is outdated, man.
99
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 6:48
>>97
If you think all four languages of
>>96 are the same language, you're a huge fag.
100
Name:
Anonymous 2007-12-07 7:18
>>99
same curly blocks of code
101
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 7:33
BASIC
102
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 8:56
>>9
your supposed to mathimaticaly/logically see the solution instead of in the language.
103
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 9:24
104
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 9:31
Java, C++ and Haskell
105
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 10:28
106
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 10:56
>>102
That doesn't make any sense.
107
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-07 11:35
it does.
108
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-08 0:51
>>102
you're*
Looks like English isn't on your list.
109
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-08 6:19
"Without need for external reference"? Does that include the standard library?
110
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-08 6:22
>>109
No, you're allowed to look up the standard lib. By external reference, I meant with respect to language syntax and fundamental constructs.
111
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-08 8:47
>>110
Very well. In that case, my list is as follows in no particular order.
C (K&R, 89, 99)
C++
C#
Java
Python
Perl
Common Lisp
Haskell
O'caml
Bourne shell script
Of these, Perl and Common Lisp are a bit iffy since the standard library is so deeply ingrained with the language proper.
112
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-08 9:06
From the top of my head:
113
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-08 12:33
>>110
In that case.
Common Lisp
C
C++
Smalltalk
Objective-C
QBASIC
114
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-08 15:08
with the language proper
115
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-08 15:12
>>114
Doesn't understand Lisp.
116
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-08 15:26
>>115
Doesn't understand real languages.
117
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-08 15:44
spanish bitch
118
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-18 2:47
Don't call me gay, but I need some mary jay!
119
Name:
Anonymous 2009-09-19 0:56
Lain.
120
Name:
Anonymous 2009-09-19 0:56
Lain.
Newer Posts