proof that lisp is a toy language

it can't even do this:
function fib(n){
 return (function(i){
   return i==1?0:arguments.callee(i-1)+(function(i){
    return i==1?1:arguments.callee.caller(i-1)
   })(i-1)
  })(n+1)
}

>>35
All lisp programmers are significantly above average.
Not all but most, that is correct. This statistical peculiarity can be easily understood if we consider the average and median of number of legs in humans: indeed, most of the humans have more than the average number of legs, due to a few outliers who have drastically less legs.

Similarly, the LISP community includes a small group of utter retards which shifts the average intelligence and coding ability well below median. Coincidentally, the same group is responsible for the 97% of the so-called LISP advocacy.