Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

camel case is for faggots

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 7:39 ID:HlV0jfcg

seriouslyGuysItsFuckingGay

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 7:45 ID:Heaven

[CamelCase] amirite

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 7:51 ID:Heaven

srsgysfckgy

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 7:59 ID:YR+lkrm8

camelCaseSavesMyPinkyFromMovingFar

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 8:06 ID:AI6c+8zq

underscore_names_fucking_suck
lisp-style-is-easy-and-legible-but-everyone-uses-this-for-minus-operator :(

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 8:54 ID:+8EydQbd

Time and place for everything.

In C don't ever use CamelCase.
Do, In java.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 9:37 ID:mbEhajsJ

>>4
That's shitCast. CamelCase requires proper capitalization.

>>6
Why not doing CamelCase in C?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 10:19 ID:m035nSks

>>4
i_can_use_both_cases_equally_easily(becauseITypeInDvorak)

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 10:25 ID:Oh00NoIY

This is extremely simple: when writing language X, use the naming convention used in the X standard library. Exceptions:

- C stdlib doesn't really use any, but basically all old big libraries and other codebases use under_scores, so use them.
- PHP uses absolutely everything. This is irrelevant, because you shouldn't use it in the first place.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 10:46 ID:Heaven

>>6
Do, In Java?
What weird and wonderful grammar (and capitalisation) is this?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 11:18 ID:eXgda2HO

>>1
What's wrong with camel case?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 12:45 ID:Oh00NoIY

>>11
OP hates it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 12:53 ID:wfEuFxuZ

i_useaMixof-conventions

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 14:15 ID:ooSNm56Q

>>1
That's shitCase, not CamelCase.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 16:24 ID:pwNHw1h1

m_iLikeCamelCase->whenIwriteStuffInC++;

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 17:15 ID:ooSNm56Q

>>15
You don't actually use CamelCase. You use shitCase.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 17:53 ID:YR+lkrm8

>>16
Oooh. ITT we save effort by not captializing the first letter.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 17:56 ID:ooSNm56Q

>>17
itt we sav efort by not ritin correctly looooooooooooooool

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 18:02 ID:pqSrMl2i

>>7
You use shitCase in C

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 19:30 ID:YR+lkrm8

>>18
Not writing correctly results in compile errors.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 19:39 ID:tS9dYpf0

>>1
ID:HlV0jfcg

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 19:45 ID:Heaven

>>21
Thread over. Sage this shit.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-27 20:28 ID:yNxNkMlZ

camelCase != PascalCase
>>7,14,16,19 are the same person

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 4:26 ID:T5fdRHeZ

>>23
I think I'm three of them, but not four of them.

Also, what's that PascalCase thing that's properly written in CamelCase? I've only heard of CamelCase and shitCase. shitCase is bullshit used by Java morons. And it's shit because you can't tell a one-word method from a variable. I use CamelCase for applicable objects, such as classes, functions or functors, and lower_case for non-applicable objects. Every other naming convention sucks for production code.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 5:54 ID:1w7vT500

When in Rome.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 6:49 ID:00Bo1b5s

>>24
what about K&R? its the same, except it uses lowercase

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 13:01 ID:iabKKbJ/

shit and camels both smell bad.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 13:17 ID:Sfl05IQE

>>27
But one of them tastes delicious.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 13:21 ID:Heaven

>>28
you're thinking of camel toe, not camel.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 13:34 ID:lKXQ6YV2

I'm thinking Cudder's

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 15:00 ID:3TmqvD5Q

>>29
No, camel actually tastes good.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 15:04 ID:kqMWJguf

It's an improvement over no style at all.  observe:
thismakesmewanttostabmyeyes

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 15:52 ID:e6duOkqb

>>32
But it's far worse than this-is-readable.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 15:52 ID:Heaven

rAndOmCAsEiSSuPERiOr

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 15:54 ID:e6duOkqb

>>34
stUdlY caPs?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 15:55 ID:9Wttnaoq

ALLCAPS IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR ENTERPRISE

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 16:04 ID:lKXQ6YV2

one_word_lowercase_thread_over

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 16:05 ID:Sfl05IQE

>>37
OneWord_OneWordLowercaseThreadOverIsNotOneWord_ThreadOver

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 16:08 ID:Heaven

>>38

one_word_shitty_style_is_shitty_thread_over

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-28 16:24 ID:Heaven

>>39
ah_yes_that_is_one_word_thread_over

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List