Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

C is the only real programming language

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 19:28 ID:V5c8Qdre

Discuss.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 19:44 ID:GEjy55lI

>>1
Cfag --optimized

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:09 ID:S7bDdlfk

>>2

Too bad whatever you use is slow as fuck

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:20 ID:Jaap1IPK

>>3
Too bad the process of writing code in whatever you use is as slow as fuck. Write->compile->diagnose-error->compile->diagnose-error->compile->run->crash was outmoded in the 50s. What's your excuse?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:30 ID:S7bDdlfk

>>4

I outsource to India

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:37 ID:LcJMLBnb

>>4
So what's the alternative? Lisp/Scheme? No practical way to deliver an application to the consumer. Smalltalk? Ditto. Python/Ruby? Interpreter overhead. D? Absolutely no industry acceptance, standard controlled by one company. Haskell? Poor libraries. Any of the .NET failure? Windows only. Java? Ha!

C and C++ win in OS and desktop programming. Everything else is for internal use, science, or the web.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:37 ID:87G902EF

>>4
butthurt user of an inferior language

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:37 ID:6TLJEX0W

>>5
Hope you enjoy Enterprise Quality substandard functionality

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:41 ID:LcJMLBnb

>>8
Hey, I resemble that remark. It's good enough for government use, it should be good enough for anyone.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:41 ID:6TLJEX0W

>>6
There aren't many applications where speed is critical. In a business, the only non-specialized apps where speed is critical lies in databases and networking latency/throughput.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:42 ID:S7bDdlfk

>>8

I meet my mission-critical solution deadlines with a high ROI and complete horizontal scalability, thank you very much

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:42 ID:U2qkTV6q

Windows only
i'm not seeing the problem

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:46 ID:Jaap1IPK

>>6
No practical way to deliver? Wut?

Interpreter overhead? Sounds pretty hairy.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:54 ID:LcJMLBnb

>>13
I'll spell it out for you. ., e, x, e. If your software doesn't ship as an exey (ELF, .app), your language is inadequate.

Lisp doesn't produce native code. Some implementations like sbcl can generate a .exe, but they do that by bundling the entire runtime. I don't want to distribute my tiny freeware apps with dozens of extra megabytes packed on.

Smalltalk is even worse. Just look into it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 20:55 ID:LcJMLBnb

>>12
How's life in La-La-Land?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 21:10 ID:87G902EF

>>15
i wish i lived there. in this world there are still people who think macs and linux are worth using. they're kinda like religious people.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 21:12 ID:S7bDdlfk

>>16

At least we won't go to hell

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 22:36 ID:8IpCBGMf

>>16
The Internet runs on Linux.  Still think it's not worth using?

www.whylinuxisbetter.net

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 22:43 ID:q4K9/O+K

>>9
Hey, I resemble that remark. It's good enough for government use, it should be good enough for anyone.
Hey, I resemble that remark.
resemble

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 23:13 ID:JfHc+j2a

>>19
needs to lurk the fuck moar.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 23:24 ID:87G902EF

>>18
re: post: prime example of how much linux users fail
re: site: lol, half of the positives being thanks to linux being to programs as ps3 is to games

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 23:24 ID:AsqOkA8s

C is superior.
Linus agreed.  Don't bother him about it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-24 23:25 ID:+oxClnZ8

THERE IS NOTHING TO DISCUSS. THIS IS SIMPLE FACT.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 2:45 ID:QBzUiZWS

Assembler is the only real programming language.  C is slow as fuck, and despite its name does NOT expose the carry flag, leading to more slow as fuck boundary checking and bit manipulation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 2:46 ID:KV0a14Z6

Too bad asembler is slow as fuck

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 3:26 ID:6fTqwfy/

>>24
Assembler is not standardized, so it could hardly be considered a "language". That aside, I always review how the compiler assembles my code before running it. Compilers rarely appreciate the grand conception of enterprise programmers and many overuse the edx register.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 5:05 ID:+2WrIhtD

>>26
yeah, edx sucks major balls

eax for life!

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 7:24 ID:Heaven

rax or gtfo.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 7:42 ID:AMYE4vBD

>>3
Too bad I don't give a fuck

>>6
Interpreter overhead.
Who gives a fuck. C has clib overhead BTW.

>>14
python.exe

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 8:39 ID:THemSV9x

>>29

clib overhead?  There is no comparison between compiled in library objects and an executed interpreter.  Your shit understanding of how things work is what makes languages like python A Very Bad Thing.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 9:04 ID:AMYE4vBD

>>30
No, it's not like I don't understand the difference. I was just making fun of you because anything but assembly/machine language with no OS has overhead. Running in a virtual machine vs. running directly in a process doesn't make a difference, other than the former being slower but much more interesting due to your introspection, hacking and security possibilities.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 9:56 ID:wgZ3y27g

>>31
OMG ASM HAS MICROCODE OVERHEAD WTF

Name: 31 2007-09-25 9:57 ID:wgZ3y27g

OMG MICROCODE HAS ELECTRICAL OVERHEAD WTF

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 10:15 ID:LywUCPoe

>>14
I'm not sure how much I trust someone who doesn't understand what "native code" means.

``Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is an open source (free software) compiler and runtime system for ANSI Common Lisp. It provides an interactive environment including an integrated native compiler...''

lol@u

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 10:23 ID:I9w62COU

Im not trolling btw , microcode can do anything your shitty ASM can, only faster, better and harder

Im not trolling btw , microcode can do anything your shitty ASM can, only faster, better and harder

Im not trolling btw , microcode can do anything your shitty ASM can, only faster, better and harder

Im not trolling btw , microcode can do anything your shitty ASM can, only faster, better and harder

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 10:25 ID:Heaven

>>34
Poe

Nevermore, you jerk.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 11:32 ID:LywUCPoe

>>36
That's Lywuc Poe to you.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 11:49 ID:AMYE4vBD

I'm OMG OPTIMIZED guy. The language I use does not matter. I design my own processors for every task. Last time I needed to sort my shopping list I designed a chip and got it made in only 15 months, for only $20000, and now my shopping list sorter is the fastest ever! Faster than Python, faster than SBCL, faster than C, faster than assembly, faster than fucking microcode! OMG OPTIMIZED!!!!!!!!! FAPFAPFAPFAP

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 13:30 ID:6fTqwfy/

>>38
Please provide proof.

We may also need to see what is on your shopping list.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-25 13:32 ID:YJSbUHAR

CCcCc cCcccccc Cc CC CCCCccCcccccccCCC.
ccCCccCcCCCcc cc CCCCcC CccCCccccc.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List