Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 10:17 ID:eE0D6gZS
Never before have authors conspired together to make shitty implementations of their own languages!
Ruby: Interpretted AST, shitty garbage collector, any naive attempt at improving performance would do so. Written by a toothless jap who doesn't know anything about programming languages. Rips tonnes of shit off of a perl and does not improve upon them. Chugs memory like a slut chugs cum.
Python: Written by a total asshole who tries to deprive the language of anything useful. Interpretted usually and sometimes JIT compiled (psycho), used by blatant assholes (Bram Cohen). Python's performance is due to extreme naivete on the part of Guido. Chugs memory like a slut chugs cum.
Perl: Evolving over many years and often buggy perl's performance is poor as it Chugs memory like a slut chugs cum. It is designed by multiple people and is actually a pretty original programming language. It is wild and whacky. That said 36 bytes per value sucks and its optimizer sucks and so does its GC.
All 3 languages suffer from a real lack of research with respect to the implementations.
Ruby: Interpretted AST, shitty garbage collector, any naive attempt at improving performance would do so. Written by a toothless jap who doesn't know anything about programming languages. Rips tonnes of shit off of a perl and does not improve upon them. Chugs memory like a slut chugs cum.
Python: Written by a total asshole who tries to deprive the language of anything useful. Interpretted usually and sometimes JIT compiled (psycho), used by blatant assholes (Bram Cohen). Python's performance is due to extreme naivete on the part of Guido. Chugs memory like a slut chugs cum.
Perl: Evolving over many years and often buggy perl's performance is poor as it Chugs memory like a slut chugs cum. It is designed by multiple people and is actually a pretty original programming language. It is wild and whacky. That said 36 bytes per value sucks and its optimizer sucks and so does its GC.
All 3 languages suffer from a real lack of research with respect to the implementations.