>>322
That's not as fun as reverse-engineering it.
So you're going to try and guess the algorithm?
That doesn't handle all the replacements, such as bawwwww bawwww bawww
Make it handle the replacements then you whining fuck.
You complain about something being "Enterprise-ready" and you moan when some other fag posts some semi-useful code. Fuck off back to ExpertsExchange, nigger.