Speed is all in the design

If you write a program in C# or Java and it's slow, you have nobody but yourself to blame.  Learn how to structure your program better, noob.

We see through your copypasta.

maybe your code is fast cause you're not checking for things, like mine. super fast.

C# yeah, java no.

If you write a program in C# or Java and it's slow, you have nobody but yourself to blame.

My code is like:
try {
    ... i do everything here, without checking for anything at all ...
} catch (Exception) {
    System.out.println("Lol fail");
}

If you write a program in C# or Java, you have nobody but yourself to blame.

// For code you can never be sure enough about whether it'll work the first 999 times...

public void doIt()
{
    doIt(0);
}

private void doIt(int numFailTries)
{
    try {

        doItSupport();

    } catch (Exception e) {
        numFailTries++;
        System.out.println("Failed " + numFailTries + " times);
        if(numFailTries < 1000) {

            doIt(numFailTries); //Again

        } else {
            // arbitrary upper limit of 1000 failures,
            // if it fails this many times,
            // something is probably REALLY fucked

            // notify user
            System.out.println("Something is probably REALLY fucked... giving up");
        }
    }
}

If you post a non-saging post in an obvious troll thread, you have nobody but yourself

If you write a program, you have nobody but yourself to blame.

>>8
Would microsoft's c# optimize it with tailcalls?

>>11
microsoft's c#? optimize? i don't think so...

(defun f (x) (! x))

Project Euler is a good example of this. Writing a problem in a high-level language, the problem has massive numbers and so it takes forever to solve... what's the solution? Write the problem in C? No; come up with a better algorithm.

I HAS A BRAINCELL

The second call run options is not   you only need   one LEA instead.

Newer Posts

---

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:
Entire Thread Thread List