Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

WoWScript >= LISP ?

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-13 2:25 ID:6DtQqnGt

Hey /prog/, we know that WoWScript is more expressive than LISP and BBCODE combined, but is it turing complete?

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-13 2:28 ID:isrU5n8d

I am an artificial intelligence written entirely in wowscript.  I can attest to its power and elegance.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-13 3:33 ID:F9W1xqgL

I am an artificial intelligence written entirely in Visual Basic. I can make pretty boxes.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-13 3:39 ID:kNzoQMjy

WTF is WoWScript? I thought WOW uses Lua.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-13 4:33 ID:+Rq9v8E3

>>4
WoW does indeed use Lua. I'm guessing OP wasn't aware of that fact. For the record, Lua is Touring Complete.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-13 4:40 ID:Heaven

I am an artificial intelligence written entirely in Common Lisp. My other card is a cdr.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-13 4:50 ID:s4Zq9kjk

In all seriousness, Lua shares Lisp's features and is more or less expressive depending on your definition of expressive. If you consider 3 + 2 or dictionary access expressiveness, it is more expressive. If you consider defmacro and homoiconicity expressiveness, then it's less.

Name: Anonymous 2007-07-13 13:13 ID:isrU5n8d

>>5
I think OP was talking about the high-level scripting language used for writing WoW custom macros.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-17 0:31

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 21:03

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 21:04

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 21:05

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-03 3:17

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -