What's /prog/'s preferred naming convention for C-like languages? Personally I find CamelCase easier to type, but under_score easier to read.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-23 5:33 ID:coKpcZ0G
>>37
1. It's stupid. If you can't tell the type of a variably by its name, you clearly need a better name.
2. It's fugly to read and type. lpszFuckMyAss.
3. It's unmaintainable. What happens when you change a variable's type or class, or a class name? It's not like your design is so limited that it can't be reused in a slightly different way, right?