>>27
It's a bad idea to install shit in separate directories named after companies, who cares about that. But it's a great idea to install shit in separate directories, and that's where the FHS fails and Windows is far more flexible. It's a terrible idea to have all the bullshit tossed into the same directories; it makes applications non-relocatable and hard to move and delete because there's shit everywhere. You depend entirely on package managers, and if you want to take an application from one machine to another running the same kernel but using a different distribution without the package for this application, you dine in hell. It's also difficult or impossible to install several versions of the same application for development, and Unix is supposed to be development-friendly. In short, FHS is even worse shit.
>>29
Yes, but in Windows it's easier to edit by directly dragging and dropping menu items, although it has bugs. KDE menus have to be edited with that clumsy, slow editor.
Note that I'm not a winfag, I'm in fact using Lunix. I just admit the few spots where Windows does better, and we're discussing these in this thread.