Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Emacs

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 8:05 ID:dqqJaI3Q

Get a GUI version of emacs & use it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 8:06 ID:AJRaAq8M

I already do.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 8:17 ID:Heaven

>>1
No thanks, I much prefer the Truetype fonts I get in my terminal to the 1970s abandonware fonts I get when using the GUI versions.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 8:22 ID:dqqJaI3Q

>>3
you can use Truetype fonts with a good GUI emacs.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 9:31 ID:+2TddG27


FUCK OFF_~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
-- INSERT --                                                  1,9           All

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 15:47 ID:uaBqB7AN

A VIM IS FINE TOO

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 15:54 ID:pmMF7+Z0

nvi > elvis > * > emacs > vim

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 15:57 ID:uaBqB7AN

- ( nvi > elvis > * > emacs > vim )

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 16:01 ID:Heaven

1 / - ( nvi > elvis > * > emacs > vim )
OHSHITS I DIVIDED BY ZERO

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 16:03 ID:Heaven

>>9
actually that would be 1/-1...

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 16:17 ID:T+gqpaaR

>>10
it would be 1/-1 ONLY if ( nvi > elvis > * > emacs > vim ) this statement was correct

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 16:22 ID:AJRaAq8M

>>7
Stack overflow, motherfucker, do you know it?

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 16:35 ID:RYh8gg2J

vim ftw

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 17:05 ID:x8Y2zXTo

>>9
>>10
>>11
ITT C faggots who forgot how to think

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 18:14 ID:T+gqpaaR

>>14

int i;
i = (2==2);
printf("%d \n", i);

prints 1.
So i was fucking right, if the statement is true, it'll be -1
if it's wrong it'll be 0

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 18:15 ID:Heaven

sizeof(vim) > 9000
sizeof(emacs) > 9000*9000

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 18:18 ID:Heaven

>>15
sorry, i missed the part where you proved that 2==2 is true

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 18:46 ID:x8Y2zXTo

>>15
lol you just fucking proved my point

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 18:49 ID:Heaven

You dumb fucks
>>9 is saying that >>7's statement is false, which is true.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 19:11 ID:zzSQKffO

People that say vim sucks just don't realize how much faster you can manipulate text in vim than any other editor.

Combining editing and movement commands + easy piping to command line text manipulation programs = win.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 19:12 ID:Heaven

People that say vim sucks just don't realize how much faster you can manipulate text in vim than any other editor.
except nvi. vim is huge like xbox, and therefore slower.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-22 22:01 ID:xAYvd71n

>>9
5. Any forced meme in /prog/ will be unfunny. No exceptions.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-23 3:10 ID:w5qWqNc4

>>21
What I meant was the number of keystrokes required to perform certain complex operations. If the vim is executing too slowly for you, maybe you should get a new computer ...

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-23 4:54 ID:csIp/FWQ

>>20
Vim piping sucks very badly. What's the point of rectangular selections is you can't pipe filter them? There is some plugin hack for that but it broke many other things the last time I tried it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-23 5:29 ID:d6Sc7+Qw

>>1
Turing, you jackass.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-24 3:40 ID:HPP/Xy4d

>>23
I don't understand why you would want to filter visual block selections, not to mention there's no guarantee the block will maintain the same shape after filtering, and it would be unclear how to line up the result with the surrounding text.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-24 5:52 ID:0NOyLsVO

>>26
I don't understand why you wouldn't want that. Emacs does it just fine and I use the feature all the time.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-24 5:54 ID:Heaven

>>29
what's the point of rectangular selections if you can pipe filter them? oh, that's right, there isn't one.

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-24 7:02 ID:Heaven

>>28
Counter-sage!

Name: Anonymous 2007-04-24 7:06 ID:kG0q/2v4

>>28
I just recently used Kate to do that. I selected a block from a table which had a bunch of definitions I needed, but in a column of a character-based table. Then I pasted it in a new file, and processed it as I wanted with a regular expression (didn't have to use pipes though, built-in), ending with something that was useful for me.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-14 13:14

SICP

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-14 13:17

I USE NANO

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-17 20:19

I WRITE DIRECT TO DISK

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-17 21:11

ed > *

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-18 4:28

sed

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-18 9:42

gvim

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-18 12:08

>>33
this but using
advanced c++ operator overloading idioms as in
http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/operator.html#fqa-13.3

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-18 12:34

GUI "versions" are for noobs than can't remember anything other than command-c command-v to copy and paste.

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-18 13:01


                                              --
                                              ---/
               -------------------\                           --/
        ------/                -----\                      ---/
       ----/         -----              ---\                ---/
    /-/          /     \               -------------------------/
   /          /   O      \
   |          |          |
  /          \       /
 /           \     /             Have you used your
/            -----                M-x artist-mode
|                                       today?
X
 \              /-
  ---           /--  /
     \-------------   -/
 ..             -/                                       /---
  \--\          ------/                                   /-------
   \  ------/                                /------
    \                         /--------------------------
     ---                   /-----
        \-----                /------
          \-----      /-----
                \-----

Name: Anonymous 2009-12-18 13:18

>>38
The GUI “version” of Emacs has normal key bindings. And CUA-mode works fine in the terminal.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List