Why wont this compile?

#include <ctime>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
    //Array processing
    int info[5][2];     //Array with 10 elements
    int amt, amto, amtt, amtr, amtv;
    int x=0;          //counter
    int y;            //number of elements in array
    int value=0;      //input value
    int total=0;      //total
    float average;    //average
    int stop=0;
   
    cout<<"\nThis program will calculate the average of up to 10 numbers\n";
    while(value!=-1)
    {
            cout<<"Enter sales ID number: ";
            cin>>value;
            if (value=1)
            {
              cout<<"Enter sales amount: ";
              cin>>amto;
            )
            else if (value=2)
            {
              cout<<"Enter sales amount: ";
              cin>>amtt;
            )
            else if (value=3)
            {
              cout<<"Enter sales amount: ";
              cin>>amtr;
            )
            else if (value=4)
            {
              cout<<"Enter sales amount: ";
              cin>>amtf;
            )
            else if (value=5)
            {
              cout<<"Enter sales amount: ";
              cin>>amtv;
            }
            }

There's more stuff after it, but this is what's important.

I keep getting these errors.
"27 expected primary-expression before ')' token "
"27 expected `;' before ')' token "

Can anyone help me!?

>>79
www.house.com

>>81
I don't know if you've already noticed, but Alaska is on the list.

>>80
>>73

>>79
>>81
And Alaska is still on the list!

OK U GYUZ R PSIN ME OF!!!!
http://programatica.cs.pdx.edu/House/

>>85
YHBT. And Alaska is still on the list. Fix it.

>>73
Points?  In *MY* language?  Not very likely.

ap id

lambdabot> pointless \ w (x, y) -> x + y * w
(`ap` snd) . (. fst) . flip ((.) . (+)) . (*)

Optimize that brainfuck code

>>>>>>>>><<-++++++++++++++.-------[--->>><<++++--[++---<<>>]]

>>>>+++-->>-->->++><<-++++-++++--++++++.-------[--->-->+++-><++<++++--[++---<<+--++++>-<+++++++->-->]]

Still waiting for a C/C++ implementation of Y.

>>91
Don't hold your breath. It's surely possible but very ugly. On the other hand an Y combinator is more of a party trick than a real programmingg problem.

>>92
Uh, I use Y all the time.

>>93
You only write tutorials?

>>94
No, I'm an EXPERT PROGRAMMER who writes 200,000 LOC, scalable, enterprise-ready turnkey web 2.0 XML UML solutions in Java.

>>94
It's called anonymous recursion. It's pretty common, unless you're >>95. There's even a module... http://cvs.haskell.org/Hugs/pages/libraries/base/Control-Monad-Fix.html

>>94
>>95
>>96

Same person

>>96
I know that but anyone saying that he uses it all the time rings my bell. I've had some use for that once or twice during the 15 years I've programmed. Maybe I just suck cocks.

>>96
Monads having fixed points with a 'knot-tying' semantics.

Using Y == taking the knot.

100th POST BITCHES

101 GET

fucking fag!!

$req = mysql_query('SELECT * FROM posts WHERE board=\'prog\' AND threadID=\'/L93LvWT\' ');

while($data = mysql_fetch_assoc($req))
{
echo($data['POST']);
}

One programming language, PHP. Thread over.

>>44
Listen to this.

>>44
I'm the guy who was arguing with you earlier but I thought you'd find this thread humorous: http://zip.4chan.org/g/res/303705.html

>>105
This has to be a joke.

I can do this in batch:

@echo off
echo Hello World!

>>107
I just puked in my mouth a little.

>>108
My, my. You must be puking a whole lot in life.

>>109
Considering MSDOS is a now antiquated piece of software, no.

>>110
wait, so you dont do any shell programming at all?
after all, cmd.exe is window'es default shell.

( one would go for bash in *nix)

in before vbscript 'masters'

>>111
there is no shell programming on windows, simply because THE WINDOWS SHELL FUCKING SUCKS.
even I can write a better one, in my spare time.

You guys fail at noticing a troll(>>107)

>>112
I hate to bear bad news, but sh and all its descendants suck too.

VALID PERL CODE

Lain.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy