Why wont this compile?

#include <ctime>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
    //Array processing
    int info[5][2];     //Array with 10 elements
    int amt, amto, amtt, amtr, amtv;
    int x=0;          //counter
    int y;            //number of elements in array
    int value=0;      //input value
    int total=0;      //total
    float average;    //average
    int stop=0;
   
    cout<<"\nThis program will calculate the average of up to 10 numbers\n";
    while(value!=-1)
    {
            cout<<"Enter sales ID number: ";
            cin>>value;
            if (value=1)
            {
              cout<<"Enter sales amount: ";
              cin>>amto;
            )
            else if (value=2)
            {
              cout<<"Enter sales amount: ";
              cin>>amtt;
            )
            else if (value=3)
            {
              cout<<"Enter sales amount: ";
              cin>>amtr;
            )
            else if (value=4)
            {
              cout<<"Enter sales amount: ";
              cin>>amtf;
            )
            else if (value=5)
            {
              cout<<"Enter sales amount: ";
              cin>>amtv;
            }
            }

There's more stuff after it, but this is what's important.

I keep getting these errors.
"27 expected primary-expression before ')' token "
"27 expected `;' before ')' token "

Can anyone help me!?

Ok, forgive me, I don't code in C so I was mistaken. You DO have to declare a function before use, however you don't have to give your prototype a parameter list. This compiles perfectly:

void fourchan();

int main()
{
 int dickNipples;
 fourchan(dickNipples);
 return 0;
}

void fourchan(int pDickNipples)
{
}

And because of this feature alone C DOESN'T and CAN'T have function polymorphism.
void fourchan();
void fourchan(char shit);

int main()
{
 int dickNipples;
 fourchan(dickNipples);
 fourchan('&');
 return 0;
}

void fourchan(int pDickNipples)
{
}

void fourchan(char pShit)
{
}

This isn't even mentioning how you C fags reinvent the wheel everytime you pass a structure pointer to a function, forgetting that classes in C++ could easily do that job for you and take away the unnecessary micro-management.

Unless you're in driver or kernel development you have no fucking reason to code in C.

>>14
You're a dumbass but I'll bite. No, you're not coding in C++ unless you use C++ constructs. C++ was made to be [largely] backwards compatible with C, blah blah blah, buy more ram. Forced indentation of code, thread over.

And bloated? I dare you look into how classes actually look once compiled. Many contructs in C++ are just meant to be a concept for abstraction, meaning they don't actually "become" code. I'm just saying that many C developers would find it easier if they ran their code through a C++ compiler and -maybe- use a few of the features provided since C++'s tighter restrictions will undoubtedly fix many of the bugs before they happen.