>>5 >>11
Try: let (<=>) :: (Num a) => a -> a -> Bool; _ <=> _ = True.
Firstly, you need a type signature to restrict the arguments to numeric types (it doesn't make sense to <=> strings!).
Secondly, if you declare it infix, don't use the prefix notation (<=>).
Good luck learning Haskell!
OP here. Inventor of "<=>" was eventually fired for hacking into the company owner's emails. Actually that's not quite true. He was fired for then complaining to the owner after he found a bunch of emails in there quite rightly discussing how terminally stupid at everything he is.
Name:
Anonymous2012-05-12 22:39
>>72
Seems like a perfect way for it to end.
Also kudos on getting us updated four years later.
Name:
Anonymous2012-05-12 22:43
OP delivers!
Name:
Anonymous2012-05-13 2:50
<=> is false if any of the operands is NaN!
Name:
Anonymous2012-05-13 2:59
>>1
try teaching him how to make a radix 4 division unit in hardware. As a bonus, extend it to support decimal64 floating point numbers
Name:
Anonymous2012-05-13 14:58
d d d d dubs
Name:
Anonymous2012-05-13 15:10
>>40 Sans Sheriff fonts are the favorite of outlaws in the Wild West.
Name:
Anonymous2012-05-19 15:45
>>75
True, but one would use an isNaN() function for that, not a spaceshop.