Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Bad things about C++

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 3:10 ID:8GT6+4Q4

Fuck OO. GOTO or GTFO.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 12:59

>>40
That's a retarded question and you know it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 13:04

>>41
Then it should be easy to answer.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 13:24

>>40
Backwards compatibility.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 13:27

>>43
Is there a better reason?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 13:34

>>44
It's easier to shove four bytes up your anus than eight.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 13:36

>>40
The compiler-writer mightve wanted that

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 13:38

>>45
back to /b/, please.

Name: HMA MEME FAN FAN 2009-01-18 13:44

>>47
hax my anus

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 14:19

>>45

* 4 b y t e s  o r  8 b y t e s . i  d o n ' t  *
g                                               m
o /     \             \            /    \       i
a|       |             \          |      |      n
t|       `.             |         |       :     d
s`        |             |        \|       |     
e \       | /       /  \\\   --__ \\       :    *
x  \      \/   _--~~          ~--__| \     |    
*   \      \_-~                    ~-_\    |    *
g    \_     \        _.--------.______\|   |    g
o      \     \______// _ ___ _ (_(__>  \   |    o
a       \   .  C ___)  ______ (_(____>  |  /    a
t       /\ |   C ____)/      \ (_____>  |_/     t
s      / /\|   C_____)       |  (___>   /  \    s
e     |   (   _C_____)\______/  // _/ /     \   e
x     |    \  |__   \\_________// (__/       |  x
*    | \    \____)   `----   --'             |  *
g    |  \_          ___\       /_          _/ | g
o   |              /    |     |  \            | o
a   |             |    /       \  \           | a
t   |          / /    |         |  \           |t
s   |         / /      \__/\___/    |          |s
e  |           /        |    |       |         |e
x  |          |         |    |       |         |x
* g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x * g o a t s e x *

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 16:01

>>30
The thing you know those aren't remotely useful and you just try to pull bullshit out of your ass so you look good on an internet forum.

>>36
Remember what I said about far/near/long pointers? Read again becauser you apparantly can't even grasp the concept of reading and coming up with a proper argument. I've made the point that void* existed in the first place is solely because you cannot expect the size of the pointer to be constant, when I said pointer size are uniform, I meant the current 32bit x86 platform, yes I missed that point, you caught it, great.

Also sizeof(int) is compiler specific on 64bit platforms, it could be defined as 32 bit or 64 bit, since int simply means integer. I could argue the int on 32 bit platforms, is it 16 bits or 32 bits. Again, some older compilers defines int as 16 bits rather than 32bits.

These replies just shows /prog/ doesn't know shit about the system they work on and confuses everything that's compiler defined vs system defined. A pointer in 64 bit system, natively should be 64 bit due to register width. x86_64 is an abnomination with it's 32bit PC (and some others as well since it's an extention and not an overhaul).

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 16:25

Also sizeof(int) is compiler specific on 64bit platforms
I would imagine the ABI defines this.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 17:14

>>51
int is guaranteed to be >= short and long >= int.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 19:15

>>50
Uh huh, sure. Want a bedtime story?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-18 19:49

>>50
A pointer in 64 bit system, natively should be 64 bit due to register width.

A pointer should be sufficiently wide to be able to address any memory location. In a system with eg. 64-bit integers and a 32-bit memory space it would be wasteful to use 64-bit pointers. Non-uniform registers aren't that uncommon, especially as you go towards smaller systems.

>>51
I would imagine the ABI defines this.

Whose ABI? There are many platforms with several, incompatible ABIs defined. Typical for 64-bit systems is the choice between ILP64, LP64 and LLP64, but that is of course only one aspect of the ABI.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-19 4:36

This may surprise you, but I actually remember making this thread almost 2 years ago.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-19 4:47

>>55
This may surprise you, but I actually remember bumping this thread almost 2 weeks ago

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-19 4:53

>>81
This may surprise you, but I actually remember bumping this thread almost 2 weeks from now.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-19 7:42

>>57
This may hax you anus, but yeah.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-19 16:47

>>40
For source code compatibility with badly programmed software.
long's are usually 64 bits tho.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-19 16:59

>>52
Which means abso-fucking-lutely nothing.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-19 18:25

>>60
ab-fucking-solutely no-fucking-thing

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-19 18:27

>>61
Haha, yeah man that sucks. Come check out my pics at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22931539@N05/

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-19 18:34

>>60
it means what it says.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-19 18:42

>>62
r u hot
r u single :)

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-20 0:03

>>1-64
☯ Please don't make troll posts!☯

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-30 19:39

>>65
Please don't make my anus

Name: VIPPER 2010-10-02 12:54

Still better than most threads ATM.
bump JEWS

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-25 20:17

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 8:52

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 5:36

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-23 23:40

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: Sgt.Kabu筽徟kiman맟 2012-05-28 22:58

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -