>>44
I don't know Visual Basic. Do they use CamelCase for functions and classes? Then at least there's ONE thing they got right.
>>46
Hahaha, get a language that doesn't rely on hacks like that to parse and tell the type of identifiers.
>>49
No, that's not the idea. There's lower_case, there's CamelCase and there's UPPER_CASE for you to use as you see fit. A language shouldn't impose you a convention, but you should stick to a decent one. And a decent one would be CONSTANTS, FunctionsAndClasses, and other_variables, plus less significant variables which you name a, b, c, .... Of course, you shouldn't need neither BufferedCocksInputShitter nor buffered_cocks_input_shitter because if you can't explain what you do with less than 3 words you're failing or missing vocabulary.