Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Bad things about C++

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 4:03

Since the python thread was a smashing success, it's only logical to have a C++ equivalent. So list the bad things about C++. Constructive thread, please. I will get the ball rolling:

 * Segment faults.
 * Broken standard library.
 * One word, the forced indentation of code. Thread over.
 * Broken templates.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 19:24

>>40
One word, the voluntary indentation of code. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 19:39

>>40
Uh, voluntary indentation is a good thing. Why do you think it's so bad? Or are you one of those python faggots

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 19:40

>>42 here
I meant >>41, not >>40

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 21:51

>>42
One word, the forced indentation of code. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 21:58

tits or it didn't happen

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 22:13

(o)(o) <---- Tits

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 23:19

>>42
One word, the discretional indentation of code. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 23:22 (sage)

SAGE FORCED MEME

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 23:23 (sage)

SAGE FORCED MEME

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 23:23 (sage)

SAGE FORCED MEME

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 23:23 (sage)

SAGE FORCED MEME

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 23:23 (sage)

SAGE FORCED MEME

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 23:36

One word, the random indentation of code. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 6:11

SAGE SAGE FORCED MEME FORCED MEME

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 6:14 (sage)

One word, the forced meme of /prog/. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 6:23

>>55
One meme, the forced indentation of code. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 11:26

>>56
One indentation, the forced thread of meme.  /prog/ over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 13:15

One core, the retardation of dual. Logic over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 9:47 ID:zySBBAsK

LOOK YOU GUYS NEED TO BE FAR NERDIER
SERIOUSLY
YOU SICKEN ME
GET WITH IT GUYS

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 11:21 ID:rWnbGCob

>>1
>> * Segment faults.
Your fault.

>> * Broken standard library.
Microsoft's fault.

>> * One word, the forced indentation of code. Thread over.
No.

>> * Broken templates.
Jews' fault.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 13:39 ID:9wie2Vwn

it empowers terrible programmers

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 13:40 ID:RhCs6fwo

ROW ROW FIGHT DA POWA!`

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 13:46 ID:FnNuWmQd

>>39

One word, the voluntary indentation of code. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-09 17:45 ID:TTNWT2R5

Just take the quote by Bjarne himself:

"Within C++, there is a much smaller and cleaner language struggling to get out."

He's basically saying "I tried to make a good language, but failed and produced C++."

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-10 0:00 ID:Ngl2jyym

he made some choices to maintain backward compatibility. but I don't think it was a good idea, maybe at the time, but today, it just does not cut it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-10 1:20 ID:zMaUd5V2

One segfault, the forced access of memory. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-10 9:32 ID:A2XMR9fI

C++ wins on speed of compiled code.  C++ fails at speed of development for anything serious.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-10 10:03 ID:703S7QKS

>>64
He was talking about c

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-10 12:33 ID:fvGEydHY

>>68
Within C++
I dont think so

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-10 14:06 ID:cHu8Ytmm

>>67
I think I might agree, but development has to be done somehow. What's a better language (that has libraries available that allow you to actually do something)?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-10 14:41 ID:AwCtHnEL

>>70
Almost anything? The library thing may place some constraints, but let's sstart with Python.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-10 14:53 ID:fvGEydHY

>>71
ONE WORD, FORCED INDENTATION OF THE CODE, THREAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-10 15:38 ID:NDrVkL5M

C# IS THE SUCCESSOR TO C++ AT LEAST UNTIL THE NEXT VERSION OF C++ IS RELEASED AND C# WILL BE EVEN BETTER BY THEN ANYWAY.
ONLY REASON TO USE C++ IS FOR SPEED. THREAD OVER.
sorry for the caps.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-10 17:02 ID:Heaven

(((ok bitch)
  (you asked for it)
  (here goes))
 (im taking out the fucking
     (bold paranthesis on you))
 (you fuqing angered an expert programmer)
 (ive been here for (expt 3 88888000) years longer than you)
 (ive read sicp twice)
 (i know every programming language in the world
    including apl)
 (if u wanna batl (lets do it))
 (ill crush you like a bean))

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-11 22:28 ID:f/GUQHgr

"C++ fails at speed of development for anything serious."

If I wanted to develop something serious, I certainly won't use some JIT or interpreted language that runs like shit.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-11 22:40 ID:Zqgwr+hg

>>75
Good for you. I would though, because such languages let me get a project done much sooner, make maintenance easier, and have fewer bugs. Portability is often easier too, if that matters.

And by rewriting a few speed-critical sections in C or assembly I can still come within spitting distance of C++'s performance. lulz

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 0:00 ID:NXjI7I7Z

I get speed of development and speed of execution from sbcl, bitches.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 0:34 ID:bxdEMFss

I LISTEN TO INFECTED MUSHROOM WHILE I WRITE JAVA BECAUSE I AM 1337

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 0:35 ID:xoBoUzRt

>>77
And you even get a way to use up all the parens you might have lying around.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-12 13:18 ID:+vh0PQgM

>>31
     1     WRITE (*,6)
           FORMAT ('FORTRAN IS EASY BALLSFACE' /)
     7     END

...and they had forced indention way before it was cool.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -