/prog/ - QT > WIN32 API

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-04 21:10

IT'S TOO BAD WIN32 API FAILED

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-04 21:12

This thread fails since the topic is self-evident.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 9:18

This thread fails since anything > WIN32 API. Save for Win16 API.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 10:23 (sage)

>>3
actually win16 might be better than win32...
is a small pile of shit better than a huge xbox pile of shit?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 0:36

QT > GTK

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 6:03

>>4
+1 interesting, let's compare:
Win16:
- Small
- Pile of shit
- Useless

Win32:
- Xbox
- Pile of shit
- Somehow can be got to do something useful

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 6:30

Native shit > Shitty libs

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 6:35

>>7
shit == shit

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 12:40 (sage)

THIS SHIT IS A SHITTY PILE OF SHIT COVERED IN SHIT

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 15:20

>>7
Native shit < cross-platform shitty lib

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 15:26

>>10
go use some butt-ugly crossplatform GUI crap, asshole. or STFU

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 15:29

>>11
that's what I do, I love Qt, it's even easy for fast-prototyping, I love it :D

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 15:32

>>12
then I'll spit in your face if you ever come near me, and then cut open your stomach and fill it with salt

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 15:35

>>13
I bet you're a Visual Basic lover? I can smell these guys far away, and you smell like some crappy Redim'ed array :D

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 16:05

>>14
more likely, it was the smell of your own shit

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 16:06

>>15
too easy, please try again.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 2:00

wxWidgets is much better than Qt, GTK, and the Windows API. It's the only reasonable option.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 4:15

>>17
wxWidgets is ugly, tho... QT and GTK can be made to look good relatively easily...

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 4:26

One word, the forced indentation of code. Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 4:54

wxWidgets looks ok to me. QT looks good automatically, if you make something with QT that looks bad, you must suck. GTK can be harder to get something good done with, though it's an easy API from a programmers perspective. All three require forced indentation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 14:16

wxWidgets has stupid macros to implements the menus and stuff, I dont' like that. Even Gtk can be easily wrapped around a bunch of classes easily.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-14 14:19

I HAS A BRAINCELL

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 6:37

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 22:32

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:50

Name: Anonymous 2012-03-23 23:38

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boyAll work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: Sgt.Kabu닆kiman勍菚 2012-05-28 22:21

Bringing /prog/ back to its people
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-28 22:26

WinRT > Qt > Win32

Newer Posts

QT > WIN32 API

1 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-04 21:10

2 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-04 21:12

3 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 9:18

4 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-05 10:23 (sage)

5 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 0:36

6 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 6:03

7 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 6:30

8 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 6:35

9 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 12:40 (sage)

10 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 15:20

11 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 15:26

12 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 15:29

13 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 15:32

14 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 15:35

15 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 16:05

16 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 16:06

17 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 2:00

18 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 4:15

19 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 4:26

20 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 4:54

21 Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 14:16

22 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-14 14:19

23 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 6:37

25 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 22:32

26 Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:50

27 Name: Anonymous 2012-03-23 23:38

28 Name: Sgt.Kabu닆kiman勍菚 2012-05-28 22:21

29 Name: Anonymous 2012-05-28 22:26