>>68
Thats my whole entire point, IT ISNT STANDARD. It should really be renamed CTL, Compiler Template Library. It makes no sense, naming it standard when it isnt standard accross the broad with different compilers and diffirent implimentation. Such the only real alternative to the STL is to use Boost, although in my opinion its where all the old C++ compiler writers go to die.
C++ is machine dependent and compiler dependent you noob. Next time lookup your compiler specifications before you post crap.