>>58
Yes i completly agree with you. I finding that with alot of produced C++ code is that the underlying design is wrong, so the implimentation becomes very complex. I just simply see it time and time again. Its frustrating to load STL up into all my packages and just see error occuring because people just don't have a good grasp on how to use it, because its freakn complex beast.
I read effective C++ today, and more effective C++, overall the book is nice. But the guy doesn't give an overview design how to handel things. He hints here and their on subjects and warnings. But gives no backup material for his comments. I think i just simply refers to the old saying 'if you can't do, you teach'. But its about 100% better than the crap i've been reading.