>>39
Cause >>35 said a few hundred numbers. Will compare fp ops when I have time.
>>40
Troll less. You know xrange returns an iterable object, and I'm applying reduce over a function (which could have been impure) and this object. It'd be pretty hard to optimize that, unless you write a recipe-based optimizer, i.e. not nearly as useful.
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-15 10:29
PYTHON IS ACTUALLY USELESS CUZ OF JAVA THAT DOES EVERYTHING BETTER AND THAT IS USED 4 THE SAME PURPOSE
Name:
Anonymous2006-12-15 12:24
>>42
Okay, so how would you do reduce(int.__add__, xrange(m)) in Java?