Where did it go wrong? Why has such a simple mark-up language turn into the bloated, over-compensation it is today? What do you turn to? XML? CSS? XHTML? PHP? CGI? ASP? SQL? PERL? HEX? BINARY? ELECTRICAL PULSES? INFARED? TWO CUPS ON A STRING?
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-06 7:51
>>40
Yeah, that'd be the enterprise-ready scalable Web 2.0 solution. You forgot AJAX BTW.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-07 2:12
vi is all you need to manage a website
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-07 2:50
>>42
Agree on the concept (a text editor is all you need to develop software, documents, web sites, and maintain them; if you need anything else you're doing it wrong/using the wrong technologies), but not on the editor of choice.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-07 3:13
why use vi when you can just write the binary code directly on the hard drive using a refrigerator magnet? If you're using a text editor, you're doing it wrong
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-07 6:46
>>44
vi is a line editor, not a text editor. And vi sucks, use ed.
>>54
you could do that but css was designed to replace the need for font tags
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-14 4:04
PDF sucks sure there's an ebuild for PDF but it just get dropped to /opt, it's statically linked, and it's CLOSED SOURCE, which means that it is a BINARY package.