HTML? More like ACHE-TML!

Where did it go wrong? Why has such a simple mark-up language turn into the bloated, over-compensation it is today? What do you turn to? XML? CSS? XHTML? PHP? CGI? ASP? SQL? PERL? HEX? BINARY? ELECTRICAL PULSES? INFARED? TWO CUPS ON A STRING?

>>18
Of course, and we should always use STRONG instead of B and EM instead of I, it's all about semantics. You know what? Fuck that. Here's the fastest, most functional and most compatible site of the web: http://www.google.com Now go see the HTML sauce. zOMG it's not best practices Web 2.0 standards compilant scalable professional XML-based enterprise ready solution!

>>20
Yeah, I fucking hate MSIE. That's the reason why pure CSS does not work unless you're a bad enough guy to tell the MSIE lamers to GTFO your web sight. I'd do that, but I'm paid not to.