>>9
Well then, no Ruby for me until they get the one and only proper character set support.
>>12
Don't bitch, "lambda" is an even worse name.
>>13
Yes, because OOP is a best-practice industry-standard business-oriented thing. Nevermind they are functions. Perhaps they'd be fine if they were exactly the same, but called anonymous methods belonging to the Anonymous static class.
Seriously, do you know what's the difference between a terrorist and an object methodologist? You can sometimes negotiate with the terrorist.