>>40
you have worthless americans who only think about themselves (BSD) and then you have your socialists who care about other people (GPL)
Lol, gb2/lsd
1. I'm not Amerikan
2. Amerikans are famous for commercial software
3. BSD is Amerikan
4. Socialists are faggots who steal your personal work and merits and promote lazyness, among other things. They kinda match the more dictatorial GPL where every other acceptable license must be GPL; however, they don't really fit "free software" licenses; socialists would be more like fagware or corruptionware.
GPL is if you want credit and you want to protect your rights while still giving everyone the same rights and never allowing someone to take those rights away
So, is it really FREE, or not? That's free of charge, but not free.
>>42
The BSD license basically says to your competitors "here's a large dildo that I made, please fuck me with it until my ass is a like unto a gaping vagina the size of a hallway".
BSD/MPL licenses are free software. They are about freedom, as in "do whatever you please with our shit, we don't need anything because we really love doing this".
I haven't seen anyone fucking BSD or Mozilla in the ass though. Perhaps they haven't released that part?
>>43
You have to be explicit what you mean by freedom.
By freedom I mean to be able to do as much as possible. Having to release, or not being able to sell, is less free than not having to release and being able to sell, for example.