Editor
1
Name:
Fnordulicious
2004-12-24 18:19
This board needs some threads. I'll start the mandatory editor flame thread that all programming discussions require.
Emacs r0x0rz. Vi sux0rz. Vi users eat aborted babies for breakfast.
Actually I use TECO, but that's beside the point.
81
Name:
Anonymous
2007-06-21 21:12
ID:TQKadlh3
WELCOME TO THE PAST BITCHES. FUCKING BUMP.
82
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-04 21:21
what
83
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-10 9:27
erheahr
arherahare <
earhaerha
aehraerhaerh
gahherhaerherh
erahehr
reahearh
84
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-10 9:28
acacacacacac
>> cacacacaca
>>> cacacacacacaccac
85
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-10 9:28
acacacacacac erherherherherherherh
86
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-10 9:29
acacacacacac erherherherherherherh
87
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-11 23:19
>>86
stop sage-testing in this thread, faggot
88
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 5:11
Wow, look at the first 40 posts... /prog used to be awesome
89
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 5:31
ITT C-x C-c
90
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 5:58
nano and pico and all the simpler eidtors don't have kdb macros and regex search & replace while it takes a little time to get in the habit of using then, once you do you can't live without em, they fukin rox
91
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 6:09
Emacs. Because ppl still have meta keys.
92
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 7:22
Emacs? I'm getting something done. Your failure is total.
93
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 7:27
>>89
Ctrl+X Ctrl+C
GNU/Fixed
>>90
No key redefine? No regex macros? FAIL
Kate and PSPad are both simple/intuitive/nice looking and powerful.
94
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 10:20
yi
95
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 13:46
i only use vi on servers when i'm ridin' dirty through ssh, vim is for major development and i've never missed anything in it
96
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 13:49
>>95
YEAH DUDE I'M SO GANGSTA I HOLD MY LAPTOP SIDEWAYS WHEN I POST FLAMES.
97
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 13:51
>>96
I invented that meme.
98
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 14:00
>>97
That is funny, because it is not a meme.
99
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 14:07
>>98
That is funny, because you're a faggot.
100
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 14:10
>>99
That is funny, because so are you.
101
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 14:11
100GET
102
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 15:14
>>99,100
Let's be faggots together.
103
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 15:14
104
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 15:30
105
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 15:39
╒════════════╕
│nobody cares│
╘════════════╛
106
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 15:50
>>105
╒════════╕
│you suck│
╘════════╛
107
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 16:22
If you are on a gui a good contender for xemacs/gedit is Scite.
For everything object oriented I use Eclipse running from a puppy linux distribution in pure ram.
108
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 22:09
>>97
I invented the "I invented that meme" meme.
109
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 22:11
>>108
I invented the "I invented the "I invented that meme" meme" meme.
110
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 22:30
>>32
correct, except in (x)windows use SciTE instead of vim. esp in win32... if you're not using a command prompt (cygwin or w/e) SciTE is great.
111
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 22:32
>>109
enough with the fucking lisp constructs already. we get it.
112
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 22:49
>>111
Lisp constructs? I'm calling them recursion. Your failure is total.
113
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 22:50
>>112
I invented the "I invented the \"I invented that meme\" meme" meme.
114
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 22:51
>>113
I invented the "I invented the \"I invented the \\\"I invented that meme\\\" meme\" meme." meme.
115
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 23:13
s%/aborted\ babies/OP's\ mom/g
116
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-12 23:17
>>112
lrn2lisp
in lisp it's common to see shitloads of nested (recursive) parenthesis. my failure is not total, just enough to make it over your head.
117
Name:
Anonymous
2007-11-13 0:24
>>93 kdb macros are not key redefines, u ignant fuck
kdb macros are programmatic macros that allow you to do fuckin anything
118
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 16:25
lol bump
119
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 16:37
Five years old already? This thread is at the PRIME AGE
120
Name:
Fnordulicious
2010-02-17 19:01
I'm still here, by the way.
Newer Posts