WHY ZIMMERMANS IDENTITY WASNT PROTECTED?

Just look at the man, a fucking hero of legend. Look at the stress the negroidals and liberals put this good law abiding citizen through. The man looks terrible like he's in his mid 40s but he's still in his late 20s and he's fat as fuck. Poor guy.

Anyone else feel bad when they saw his bloodied face during the incident? He looked a lot healthier back then but now it's a shame what happened to the good man.

His identity should have been protected unless he was found guilty. Zim is the only victim here of a close encounter chimp out and the negroidals.

You have a point but it's too heavily fortified with racism.

There are two arguments against your position, which may change your view. Firstly, publication of who has been accused of a crime can allow other victims to feel like they can come forward. In the UK, the most prolific paedophile for decades was a 'well-loved' celebrity called Jimmy Savile. He operated with impunity for years, until the first real public investigation began. Then literally hundreds of victims came forward. All people who had believed the lie that they were weak and no one would believe them. Individually they were too frightening to come forward. Together, they have shone light on horrific crimes, and - albeit too late - the truth has come out.

Secondly, public trials allow scrutiny of the judicial system, review of the state's power, a guard against corruption, and allow the public to see justice done. This ought to strengthen the community, give people faith in the justice system (which should guard against vigilante attacks), and deter future crimes - as potential criminals can see that they too could be brought to book.