What if there was a conspiracy so large, yet so simple, that the United States' political system and society at large are affected by it?
I mean to say it's possible (though may be improbable) that certain events are set up to stoke the flames of the liberal-conservative divisions. Benghazi, IRS, Associated Press... All of these seem almost "too good to be true" for the stoking of the Republicans' fires. What if they were intentionally done to ratchet up the rhetoric on both sides?
I've become aware of a concept recently: dialectical materialism. This concept is often referred to as a mainstay of communism: where a society ages and matures, there arise some sorts of "contradictions" which essentially splits the population into groups centering around these topics. Rhetoric eventually gives way to violence and the winning ideals permeate the new society.
I brought this up because I believe a puppeteer of sorts is artificially creating events and contradictions in our government and political systems to bring this about much more quickly.
Thoughts?
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-26 13:26
So, this concept is not limited to events: ideals and even orderly topics of discussion are set to the fore to be mainstays of arguments for our parties.
Certain subjects are even of a semantic nature! I think we can all agree, at least, that our politics can get quite ridiculous!
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-26 19:25
I brought this up because I believe a puppeteer of sorts is artificially creating events and contradictions in our government and political systems to bring this about much more quickly.
Spoiler: the puppeteer is JEWS, you have now been redpilled
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-27 18:20
>>1,>>2,>>3 Semitic, Semantic, Systemic. These three things are not the same as each other. I trust that the Jews would not be stupid enough to upset it's superiors by stealing from them. If you look several ranks down the illuminated chart, you will see how Hitler attempted such a foolish game and lost it as a result.
The Jews are the least of your worries. The humanoids are pathetically fragile. We freely toss stones, solar flares and storms at your planet and you act as if it is your beloved deity is doing it to assist you. Not once did you ever consider the fact that we were actually just killing you just for fun.
Remain a optimistic idealist, human. It's the only way you will humorously endure what is coming up next.
The hour will come in which all the peoples of the earth will awake, and the Jews will be the victims. -- Joseph Goebbels, 21 January 1945
Name:
Anonymous2013-06-02 21:19
>>5
Hello dude-bro, sounds like "it" = "rough-sex".
Name:
Anonymous2013-06-03 11:37
>>1
Long story short these "contradictions" are disagreements between groups of people, and over time these disagreements are remedied by negotiation or force. Karl Marx imagined that over time rulers would have to push their system further and further towards its logical conclusion, thereby intensifying divisions in society. History though has proven that systems prefer to influence their environment and make it more favorable rather than overstep their bounds, for the simple reason that they are not ideologues like Karl Marx and judge actions by their consequences. Those systems that did push things too far were those that failed to adapt to changes.
So for example Japan was in a period of peace and economic stagnancy for 250 years, during this time the Tokugawa established a rigid conservative system that remained largely unchanged. It was only shattered due to major changes on the outside world and the socio-economic effects of the new technology they adopted, not internal affairs.
Name:
Anonymous2013-06-03 14:27
The real reason why Mitt Romney lost: His state is drowning in poverty.
Salt Lake City, Utah
Pct. growth, suburban poor population: 141.7% Suburban poverty rate: 12.2% (43rd highest) Suburban share of metro poor population: 73.1% (17th highest) 10-yr. population change: 16.0% (58th highest)
More than 157,000 people in the Salt Lake City metropolitan area lived below the poverty line as of 2011. Of these, more than 115,000 people, or more than 73%, lived in the suburbs. The number of poor in the suburbs has increased by more than 140% from the year 2000. In addition to this increase in suburban poverty, the number of city residents living below the poverty line rose 55% from 2000 to 2011 — well in excess of the 28.7% increase in cities nationwide. Between 2000 and 2010, the area’s population rose from less than 970,000 people to more than 1.1 million, an increase of 16%. However, the population of the Salt Lake City suburbs likely accounted for most of this increase, rising 19.1% in that time, while the city’s population rose 3%
Name:
Rabbi Schlomo Platinumstein2013-06-03 23:59
95% white 10-yr. population change: 16.0% (58th highest)
OY VEY! White people having more children? It's like a second shoah!
Name:
Anonymous2013-06-04 14:29
>>12
Didn't you hear, we don't use the word "Shoah" anymore. It's now a "friendly purge". Also if you didn't know: Jews and Gingers are white people too.
Name:
Anonymous2013-06-12 22:33
>>11 The real reason why Mitt Romney lost: He was a RINO who offered nothing substantively different from Obama.
Gun owners and working-class Whites (groups of which there is considerable overlap, to be sure) saw that once again, they were being offered a choice between two corrupt Leftist apparatchiks who had made careers out of spitting on and shitting on gun owners and working-class Whites. So tens of millions of them boycotted the 2012 elections, just like they boycotted the 2008 elections, the 2004 elections, and the 2000 elections.
Name:
Anonymous2013-06-13 3:13
thats fucking stupid.
Romney won his home state.
Name:
Anonymous2013-06-13 3:16
Mitt Romney won his home state. Salt Lake city could have been on fire for all the relevance it had towards the general election, he still would have taken Utah.
Name:
Anonymous2013-06-13 3:19
I mean that literally. Like, literally on fire. It could have been wiped out in an automic blast, people would have just updated mapquest before driving to the ballets.
Name:
Anonymous2013-06-13 3:20
You know, ballets? Those big buttons you press to make you feel like your worthless opinion is somehow relevant or meaningful?