Everything is in motion

This is an open source document. it requires your input for perfection. Please edit and repost at your will, i look forward to it.
Logic-non.

The words i chose to never write here have been residing in my mind for some time now. Due to the nature of the governments
and the control within them, i have been very careful in choosing when to enact the writing of these words. Change is necessary
and sameness obsolete. It is time to awaken to what the true state of affairs are that govern your life.

The Slave Master and His payments
    To grasp this we must first know we are slaves, or, at the very least, indentured servants. How? Through the use of money.
We are paid to survive. We adhere to the laws of the slave master by surviving, day in and day out, through the whip of the slave master.
If he isn't pleased, we are punished, or seek a new slave master. How are corporations slave masters? Simple, they don't adhere to laws set
forth by our constitution. Clearly. The use of their "plantations," if you will, create an atmosphere similar to the cotton and tobacco fields
of the south. But it's different now, we have unions and people protecting us! Those people are the extended slave master, my friend.
    Money is the source of the control. Money is worthless until we give it true value. It becomes valuable not only for the paper it uses,
or the ink pressed on it, but the fact it is redeemable in goods and services. This, however, is continually taxed and even infiltrated, by the
slave master, in an attempt to control his best and worst slaves. We are cleverly blinded by wants and desires through use of money. We are stronger
than that, because we as people only want to help one another. Out of that want this writing is formed. Money is nothing. Paper money is nothing.
Most material items are nothing, even the food you eat, except a concept for survival. Everything you have come to understand lies in the trick of
being chained without knowing it. Money is the chain. You have the right to lay down your tools and fight for what is right.

Fixing the System
    Today we face the emerging problem of how to resolve this. People in power have everything they need to stop an uprising through knowledge
of such events. The key, however, is understanding the one fatal flaw in the system. The key to the chains, if you will, is the knowing that money
buys nothing. Literally. The goods you produce can be traded for goods you need to survive. There is no dire need for someone to tax you on your
services for creating the goods you produce to survive. The only, logical, means of taxing you is for the continuation of the system. Tax is something
that does not need to exist if everyone agrees to pay through goods alone. When people take taxes, they skim for their own desires. Tax is becoming
something that only hinders the advancement of people through menial tasks. When combined with inflation, tax becomes a means of choosing what someone
can afford and cannot afford based on the menial tasks they do for survival. To continue in these affairs is to continue enslavement through use of
self. To adjust the system to work for the self again, one must first break the bonds of enslavement and become the master of their own true destiny,
not the manifestation of a corporation's agenda.

Theories of change
    Several theories remain at the forefront of how to resolve this system. Some by force, where violence is condoned and even sanctioned by the
counter-opposing forces. Violence is not a proper way to demonstrate a resolution. The reason, is simple, violence can be linked to crime which can
remain prosecutable until the current law is reformed. Law operates as a means for detouring people of their goal, much like it had during many different
periods of time, we find people taking arms but not knowing who to aim at. To take arms, physically, at this point will only hinder your performance in
the upcoming change. Keep that in mind when deciding your course of action.
    Other theories involve more passive "sit-ins" where denial of services become evident. This, in turn, detours corporations from advancing
economically in the arena of capitalism. This, in effect, is also menial at best and only allows for slight shifts, if any, in power among corporate
advocates. It is important to understand that this form may also result in punishment through the same system of law used to stop violence. Sit-in's
do advance the morale of the people where as violence will break it, and as we have seen, morale is very high for those on the opposing side of dictatorial
government systems.
    Passiveness may be one of the scariest forms of demonstration because it, in turn, effectively allows for things to play out as they will. This
is the direct counter-approach of an activist, because by definition, they are active. In many ways we operate in and out of this mode, yet still conduct
activism by educating ourselves, and others, with information about the topic. In a way, doing nothing is a simple solution as long as doing nothing
evolves the sphere of understanding.
    To fully combat the system, as you can see, there is very little hope for effective change through individual efforts. I believe, through a series
of combining theories, we can achieve the change we actively seek. This will require fully understanding more than the three theories laid here to read,
your input on combating measures is important to advance the overall goal of this community. Combined efforts will result in inevitable change.

Paper Money as a Problem
    When discussing this topic with fellow seekers of truth, i find the root of evil to manifest in money itself. Where we can observe documentaries
such as Zeitgeist: The Federal Reserve, we can see through explanation how herded we are as people through the manipulation of money. One thing, this
manipulation has created, is a dependency upon it. The common response to my statement "if we could just get rid of money" is "then what will replace it?"
The answer is simple, Ummar Qaddafi may be on the verge of understanding the true solution to the problem through implication of gold as currency. How does
this drastically change anything? Gold is a precious metal, as we all know, that can be bought and sold. It is the old form of currency but was redeemable,
in it's weight, for its actual worth. Gold is the stepping stone for the change, along with the barter system, for how to resolve the current state of
chaos known as the federal government. Precious metals offer a key to taking paper money away from the master's hands and putting it back in the slave's
pocket.
    This does not mean, however, that this is the correct solution in my opinion. A truely deep spirtual understanding of material objects will rid
the world of strife caused by wealth. This will not be easy, because everyone will not become, for lack of a better term, enlightened, to the use of
non-material substance. The true problem of the system lies in the worth of ourselves. We think of ourselves as worthless when we do not have a job,
or money, because in this society we are deemed such. The truth, however, is that you are not worthless. I believe that is what people are truly afraid of
finding, their true worth, and because of this they allow the system to spin as out of control as it has been for as long as it has been. Everyone
who reads this document is not only correcting my gramer, arguing against my theories, or agreeing with them, but actively demonstrating their true self
worth by analyzing the fine details this document entails, and correcting them as they see fit. Your true worth has nothing to do with the money you have,
the cars you drive, or any measure of materials you can acquire on this earth. Precious metals are material, and thus only a crutch for the true solution.

Credits
    The idea was purposed of non-taxable, non-inflation-able credits to pay people for their services to businesses. Its fundamentally important to
understand that change will require an ease into it, a massive shift will not be possible and cause panic. Credit's may offer a solution, but only on
one true assumption, that no matter your profession you are paid equally for your worth of work. A doctor should not make more credits in one hour than
a mechanic. This is dangerously close to communism, but requires a deeper look in the fundamental error of worth through the system of money. Our janitors
are paid less because anyone can do their task, while our lawyers are paid more because they argue better than the janitors? It makes little sense, really,
if everyone has a profession and are masters of that profession, they should hone their skills in that profession and be paid accordingly. There should be no
incentive to advance because that simply, again, furthers the want for material substance. The want should be to create a better society for ourselves, and
future generations. If that retains as a truly powerful motivation, then doing this is simple, really. Credits offer the true balancing of peoples worth
with their abilities if used in the correct manner. Sliding scales depending on a persons abilities can also change the amount they are able to make, based
on the amount they are able to work, and so on.
    The credits theory is also in refinement. It may not hold very much power as a solution to the problem of paper money being the chain that bonds
us to unfair working conditions. Credits may also be controlled by the same people that control paper money if not handled correctly. This is a very scary
realization and one that must be considered further to before actually enacting true change among the system. This concept is still in the air, and requires
a closer look on those who agree/disagree with it.

Goals
1. To make our world sustainable for our children's children
2. To protect our world and become as Eco-friendly as possible
3. To preserve our health, as well as the others around us
4. To always provide a hand to those in need
5. To openly accept everyone for who they are
6. To educate others on possible solutions
7. To discuss our solutions with one another
8. To keep our conduct motivated in observance of our goals
9. To observe all religions, walks of life, and understandings of life as sacred
10. To, above all else, solve the grip of capitalism on our world today

Thank you for reading, this again is an open source document that requires your input, please feel free to contribute any input =)
Logic-non.

how can you possibly look at qaddafi's UN rant and consider him to be a responsible person trying to better the world

never said anything about his rant, simply his concept of accepting gold as a means for trading oil rather than paper money which is not redeemable in its weight, like gold is. The rant, im sure, has sparked fury among chosen "elite" (or any other name you would prefer) as deviating from the system they currently control. What are your thoughts on qaddafi? Do you consider him, for lack of a better term, evil?

glancing over an article it seems his rant has nothing to do with paper money, perhaps im incorrect. something about demanding an African seat on the Security Council, among some other arguments were presented as well. By large, to me, it looks as those this is the waters being stirred on a political front by which share no appeal to what im aiming to resolve. i don't think its correct to condemn qaddafi for making remarks on any set of principles he has frustration with, but looking again at this nytimes article it seems that is exactly what the media has done. im not interested in peoples opinions of other people, that is really just another way of blocking an overarching goal. what i am interested in is resolutions to problems faced by a rapidly growing consumerism by which none of us, or the earth, are ready for. Qaddafi is a very interesting subject in this because, for the most part, American propaganda has left him in American's eyes as a fascist dictator ruling with an iron fist when that simply just isn't the case. Qaddafi may not be the exact leader required to make the world a better place, by any means i am not arguing that, but his concept on money does require a second take if it is to hold any resonance in a push against consumerism.

http://www.knowledgeoftoday.org/2012/08/The-Venus-Project-presents-Paradise-or-Oblivion-2012.html

>>7
He was a regular dictator and his regime did everything that dictatorships have commonly done through history.

The Libyan civil war was due to the inability for the regime to adapt to socio-economic changes and his bizarre behavior suggests he was partially responsible for this.

Oil was a major factor encouraging NATO involvement and helping the rebels to negotiate for supplies.

There are no restrictions on trading oil, you could trade it using frozen concentrated orange juice as a medium of exchange if you wished.

The euro has competed with the dollar for years and the world economy hasn't collapsed.

Gold coins aren't a threat to the international financial system, gold has been around for millennia, the gold standard fell out of favor because fluctuations in the price of gold contributed to price instability.

The dollar and the euro are major reserve currencies because it is easier, you don't have to exchange currency as often to make a transaction, reducing fees and risks. Along with the euro, the Iranian bourse and Chinese Yuan have financial services facilitating the oil trade, yet even with these economic giants and an oil giant like Iran the dollar is still competitive. OPEC has member states like Venezuela and Iran yet it still trades with the dollar.

What do you think the Gold Dinar would have done?


#                                                              
#  ,---.          |    ,-.-.          |         |    o|        
#  |---',---.,---.|__/ | | |,---.,---.|--- ,---.|    .|--- ,   .
#  |    ,---||    |  \ | | ||---'|   ||    ,---||    ||    |   |
#  `    `---^`---'`   `` ' '`---'`   '`---'`---^`---'``---'`---|
#                                                          `---'

It seems that a flux in gold prices would serve the same purpose as paper currency, in this case euros and dollars, because inevitably the same means by acquiring wealth would become standard practice. It makes sense that the gold dinar fell out of favor due in that regard as well, and by the same means, a change back to say, gold dinar's would only serve as a quick patch, if any type of patch, and a shift to acquiring gold rather than say, loans.

I suppose the issue im getting at involves the fees and risks associated with currency itself. It makes sense to have currency, by any means, trade becomes easier now that you dont have to trade your donkey for milk then for a tank of gas. that i accept, but by which the whole economy is run is based off this currency which directly is in flux with inflation and taxation seems a bit odd, especially when certain tasks are labeled with different monetary amounts. This in conjunction with the alleged "elite" controlling class which own the rights to loan this currency out. it seems like operating on someones tooth shouldn't be worth 5 donkeys, and flying jet planes for the us army worth 10 donkeys, and rebuilding the city that that jet fighter blew down, well that would be worth a whole 20 donkeys.

i guess the question then turns to the belief of needing competition for survival, because this in essence is what is happening due to the common need to trade goods. if you look at it from a standpoint of maintaining competition, then there can be a natural balance of power as the Darwinian theories hold true over time. is there even a way to balance out the need for the human race to not compete?

not to answer your question with a question, i think you are right about the gold standard. from how the evidence is piling, perhaps Qaddafi isn't worth backing in this case, and ill look into his history a little further before i continue about him. Thank you guys again for your responses =D

>>10
"Pack mentality"?

>>4
This sounds dangerously like the Georgia Guidestones.

Why would he promote the UN agenda if the UN doesn't like things he promotes? Are they trying to distance themselves from a inferior product they created just like how God distances himself from a inferior human that he created?

The credit system would only work if the Government wasn't so afraid of assuming the role of the central bank that is hated so much. Then they wouldn't need to tax the populous because the profits would break even. A monopoly government, if you will.

>>1
If he is serious about the inflation issue, then all un-banked cash should have a expiration date on it. Not only would business be more efficient but people would be more likely to spend and counterfeiting would be more difficult because a bill that doesn't expire in public would be a easy money-trail target for agents to neutralize. Also it would devalue converted foreign currency to nothing at the exchange points.
Bit-coins are shit by comparison because they don't increase in value when other coins are lost.

Win-win everywhere.