>>24
Sorry, but everything is subjective.
Hmm... no, I'm guessing your inability to bring up a court case supporting your position is indicative of the lack of evidence. In any case, that you have yet to succeed to find anything is certainly objective. You haven't even tried. Objectively.
Oh, but look at this, an actual attempt! Let's see if this will work...
>>25
In 1984, the Ontario government joined the criminal proceedings against Zündel based on Citron's complaint. Zündel was charged under the Criminal Code, section 181...
followed by your triumphant:
That is the famous American "freedom" of speech!
Let's zero in on a few key words here.
the Ontario government
That is the famous American "freedom" of speech!
the ONTARIO government
That is the famous AMERICAN "freedom" of speech!
I know you aren't working with much, but humor me. Can you tell me, with your copious brainpower, where this case happened?
Oh, and from the database of the CANADIAN Supreme Court:
http://scc.lexum.org/en/1992/1992scr2-731/1992scr2-731.html
The court's decision was overturned by the CANADIAN Supreme Court. In ONTARIO.
So not only are you misrepresenting facts (because the decision was ruled unconstitutional... in Canada!), you couldn't even get the goddamn country right. You've evidently eaten enough paste to think that Ontario is in America.
I came back to this thread expecting you to actually make a coherent claim for evidence. But you can't even get your geography down. Fuck, even the >Canadian< Supreme Court overruled it! In CANADA! Where this fucking case HAPPENED!
The nice thing, of course, is that I don't need to argue to imply you are a retard. Your posts make the point quite clearly.