>>14
First, I'd like to say case closed on your statement on the "banned" USA holocaust denial, which is, I repeat again, dumb beyond words, and indicative of your thought process as a whole. As expected, your reasoning behind it was sub-par in the extreme.
So what about the other half of your argument?
Oh wow. Wikipedia again. And look! Jesus, you couldn't even link to the appropriate page!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law
If you need it spelled out for your leaky brain even more:
http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/what-defamatory-statement
http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/opinion-and-fair-comment-privileges
You actually don't understand. Unbelievable.
If I call John a jerk, or a nigger or a kike, it is considered an "opinion". This significantly reduces the chances a court will even bother to look at it, thanks to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
MOREOVER, the court determines if anyone would likely accept the statement as fact. No court in the entire USA will worry that some redneck called a black guy a "dirty nigger" and that suddenly the guy won't be able to hold a job because he is a "dirty nigger" to everyone.
If you said, "This black guy stole something", THAT would be "defamation of character", since you are making a factual claim which cannot be construed as opinion, and everybody distances themselves from a thief.
(To preempt the sadly predictable, if you want to claim that the U.S. courts would understand "nigger" as implicitly "a thieving person", you will need to provide a court who understood the term this way. Evidence! Gasp! Which leads to the next point:)
My explanation may tell why you cannot cite any U.S. court case which claims otherwise. There are none. You don't have to like my explanations. You are, after all, not playing with a full deck. But your arguments fail in the concrete: no black man ever won a court case in the USA because someone called him a "nigger". Ever. I challenge you to find me such a case. You will fail.
I think that you've had enough.
In general, making extravagant and categorical statements on subjects which I have demonstrated you know nothing about whatsoever, makes you look, as I said much earlier, ignorant and crazed.
0/10 for getting me to respond to your shitposting.