Blood Libel?

You bet!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pussy_Riot
The commotion surrounding the Pussy riot sentence took a disturbing turn on August 30, 2012, when the bodies of two murdered women, mother and daughter, were found in Kazan, Tartarstan, with a message, “Free! Pussy Riot” written in capital letters in English on the wall of the apartment, using the victims’ blood.
Igor Danilevsky, a 38-year-old professor at a Kazan university, confessed to the killings and was detained.

Must I remind you that "-sky" surnames aint Russian? Neither are surnames Tolokonnikova and Samutsevich.

So what is wrong with eliminating the "minority"?

Sounds like you missed your thread.

>>2
which one?

And now for the unedited version!

>Local police investigator Andrei Sheptitsky stated that he believed the killer was “either psychotic or a drug addict”, and trying to mislead police by attributing the crime to Pussy Riot’s supporters.
>The suspected murderer, an acquaintance of the daughter, said he wrote the message to distract police.

Must I remind you that OP is full of shit who doesn't think you will read the source he uses?

>>4
Andrei Sheptitsky
A kike shields Pussy Riot commies. Leftists are well known for ritual killings and drawing pentagrams (commie stars) with blood of their victims.

look at anarchists: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhmF5p2Z7Ec

raving demoniacs possessed by Satan!

Here is a proof Karl Marx was an embodiment of the Devil himself:
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/marx.htm
In this revolution we will have to awaken the devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions.

>>4
Must I remind you that OP is full of shit who doesn't think you will read the source he uses?
You expect a demented person to consider such a thing? Hell, he deplores Christianity, but then uses fundie propaganda (with spurious quotations from famous people no doubt) to make his case.

If you're going to be an anti-semitic nutcase, at least strive to be a consistent anti-semitic nutcase.

>>5
So if he's a Jew then why is he crediting the killer who you believe to be a Jew who was framing a Jewish band who are against Jewish Putin? Your rantings and baseless claims are contradicting each other more than usual in this circumstance.

>>7
Hell, he deplores Christianity, but then uses fundie propaganda (with spurious quotations from famous people no doubt) to make his case.
I'm unsure if there is a "God", but there is surly a Satan. You can see it by looking at Satan's children - Yids. Jews embody everything from folktales about demons.

>>8
There are two kinds of Jews:
1: liberal/leftist Jews
2. Zionist Jews
Putin's government are a Zionist Jews, who are far less dangerous than leftists.

When a Jew says "democracy" what he really means is "demonocracy".

>>9
Putin's government are a Zionist Jews, who are far less dangerous than leftists.
So one group of Jews are less bad than the other? This contradicts your many earlier claims that all Jews are equally bad and must go. So which is it?

You should just admit that you're full of shit and what you post on here is nothing more than entertainment for us all. You're like the online version of the homeless guy that used to putter around the city I live in waving an American flag shouting "YOU! YOU! The end is near!" before he got hit by a drunk driver whilst he was riding his bicycle drunk.

>>11
This contradicts your many earlier claims that all Jews are equally bad and must go. So which is it?
All Jews are bad, but some are badder. My claim is that there are no "good Jews". Nothing redeems them.


The end is near!"
he got hit by a drunk driver
Well, he was somewhat right. Probably had feeling about his own demise.

http://www.henrymakow.com/lucifers_chosen_people.html
Rosenthal said in part: 'Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer -- so I wasn't lying -- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.'" (www.macquirelatory.com/Wallace Interview 1967.htm)


In most Jewish synagogues, a bright burning flame represents their god. The Hebrew word for Lucifer is "Hillel" (Strong's Concordance #H1966) meaning "bright light." Curiously, this is the name chosen for the Jewish student organization. A central text in Cabalism is entitled "the Zohar," which translates to the book of brightness or splendor.

The Jewish six-pointed star is the highest symbol in the occult and goes by various names--the Star of Moloch/Saturn/Chiun/Remphan. It is a symbol of the union of male and female and is identical in meaning to the Masonic square and compass, which is also a six-pointed symbol around the letter "G" representing the generative sexual act. In place of the "G" we find יהוה amidst many Jewish stars.

The Hebrew symbol חי worn around the necks of many Jews ostensibly symbolizes "life" (lachaim). The word literally translates to a "living thing" or "beast" (H2416); this symbol is an idol for The Beast.


The Jewish name for god is represented by the tetragrammaton יהוה (YHVH) can be pronounced Yahweh or Jehovah. The significance of God's name is repeatedly emphasized throughout the scriptures.

When dissected in the Hebrew, the true definition of Jehovah (Yah-Hovah) is revealed. "Yah" (#H3050) means "god". "Hovah" (#H1942) translates to "eagerly coveting, falling, desire, ruin, calamity, iniquity, mischief, naughtiness, noisome, perverse, very wickedness."

Jehovah is synonymous with Baal:

"Baali (#H1180) From ba'al with pron. Suff.; my master; Baali, a symbolical name for Jehovah -- Baali."

The Jewish Encyclopedia ("Adonai and Ba'al") reveals: "The name Ba'al (), apparently as an equivalent for Yhwh."

Since the days of Jeremiah, the Jews have forgotten their god's name and replaced it with the title "Baal" or "YHVH": The lying prophets "Which think to cause my people to forget my [God's]name...as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal." (Jer 23:27).


YHVH and Ba'al both represent the god of sexual perversion and wickedness, Satan.

However, Jews claim that this name (YHVH) is not to be spoken aloud, despite God's command to declare His name throughout the earth (Exo 9:16). Why ignore this commandment?

>>12
Well, he was somewhat right. Probably had feeling about his own demise.
Well, when you're a drunk homeless guy, you really don't have much of a future ahead of you. Here's to the sanest thing you've ever said on world4ch.

The word literally translates to a "living thing" or "beast" (H2416); this symbol is an idol for The Beast.
The Beast comes from the Book of Revelations, Christian metaphor coughed into existence much later than the adopted use of the Tetragrammaton or any of its shortened.  Regardless of how you interpret Revelations, excepting a completely literal one, the Beast is a placeholder for something else.  Bridging the two like you did, however, would be like claiming that we're all Nordic because we call our planet Earth (Germanic goddess, mother of Thor). There's also the Islamic "Beast of the Last Days" but I don't want to make a leap like that until more common ones are exhausted, though that might be what John drew inspiration from when writing Revelations.

When dissected in the Hebrew, the true definition of Jehovah
You can't.  Hebrew has no "J" and I believe Aramaic didn't either. "Jehovah" is a construction of people named the Masoretes, early Israeli scribes and scholars who translated the Hebrew Bible in the 6th century.  Jehovah is their constructed interpretation of the Tetragrammaton, starting with "YHWH" and inserting vowel sounds from other names of God that were permitted in that situation.  The "J" is an import sound.

>>15
like claiming that we're all Nordic because we call our planet Earth (Germanic goddess, mother of Thor)
There is nothing wrong with worshiping Earth goddess, compared to worshiping Satan.

>>16
Worshipping any sky wizard/spaghetti monster is fucking retarded.

>>17
Agreed.

>>17
Worshiping Satan is just evil.

>>19
Worshipping Satan would be included in that list as also being quite a retarded thing to do.

>>20
Being a rich Jewish banker/hollywood-celeb
quite a retarded thing to do.

>>21
Hollywood celebs are pretty retarded as well. Not sure what that has to do with worshipping Satan. When I think of Satan worship, I picture a bunch of edgy teenagers who think being atheist isn't "cool enough" or some other nonsense.

>>22
Danilevsky (who has PhD) doesnt look like a "edgy teenager" and he had absolutely no reason to kill. He just wanted blood.

Another kike, Leo Moshinsky, created an Adamites sect, full of child molesters:
http://www.porjati.net/awful/3300-sektanty-adamity.html
http://www.ystolika.narod.ru/images/mash.jpg

and that is just a tip of the Jewish question in modern Russia.

>>23
I have no idea who that is. Nor do I care to know.

>>19
I'm not arguing against that, you stupid fuck. I don't care whether it's Satan or Christ or Odin, worshipping non-existent entities for which you have no evidence for their existence makes you a blithering idiot. There's nothing that doesn't become plausible when you accept irrational ideas as unquestionably true. Magic dancing ponies become your absolute moral authority because anything goes and "you can't prove it's NOT true" becomes your first and last resort to all opposition.

>>25
Jewish Satanist, who killed Russian women.

>>26
That's delusional, but not idiotic.  "Idiotic" manifests in how that belief is applied.

>>27
The ultimate proof of not reading replies.  He said he doesn't care.

>>13
In most Jewish synagogues, a bright burning flame represents their god. The Hebrew word for Lucifer is "Hillel" (Strong's Concordance #H1966) meaning "bright light." Curiously, this is the name chosen for the Jewish student organization. A central text in Cabalism is entitled "the Zohar," which translates to the book of brightness or splendor.
I don't trust this Henry the-Mad-kike character...
Check this out, (comments section)
http://www.henrymakow.com/jewish_messianism_behind_nwo.html

I am a Jew. Jews like everybody else are subverted and manipulated and enlisted in the Cabalist cause.
So kikery has been hijacked by the <i>Cabala</i> (sic) ...
Yeah, makes sense.
ILLUMINATI BANKERZ hurr durr *BURP*

So:

1 - He's as confused, ignorant and contradictory as the Stormfeggits
2 - He's just another bamboozling kike
3 - His site is written by a team of bamboozling kikes (notice  those typos in the comments section)

>>29
The "Shalom guy" made a distinction between standard "Jewish filth" and Zionists in a previous thread, so there's a precedent of dividing between manipulative Jews and manipulated Jews.

>>28
No, there's no way it's not idiocy. If you're intellectually unable to follow a simple line of logic to its obvious end then you can rightly be described as idiotic.

>>31
I believe you're doing someone who is religious a disservice by clustering them into a camp whose self-defense is "you can't prove it's NOT true."  Human psychology is cluttered with irrationalities that are considered normal because they are tolerable - some less so than others - and shortcuts that one's brain requires to, metaphorically-speaking, simply wrap its head around all the information it processes.  And then are some things that people just want to believe because that is the way they wish they world really was; living that life is their way of maintaining sanity (tolerability).  How can something like hope be denied?

>>32
Because it does not reflect reality. It is an irrational, self-destructive belief that sabotages your ability to relate accurately to the world around you. When you believe something that you have absolutely no evidence for as true you open your mind to all sorts of stupid shit, you set a precedent you cannot escape and crippled your ability for intellectual thought.

You talk about accepted irrationalities but the scale is entirely different. These irrationalities are most of the time still destructive but like I said, no nearly on the same scale as believing in deities. For example, being afraid of the dark because fearing unknown beings inside it is self-destructive but it generally doesn't change noticeably how you interact with others.

For example, being afraid of the dark because fearing unknown beings inside it is self-destructive but it generally doesn't change noticeably how you interact with others.
Ask any parent and they'll tell you amusing anecdotes about nightlights and how their child behaved.  Fear of the dark does change how a person behaves; it's self-destructiveness is low because children - the typical afflicted - don't have much leeway with night activities when they're that young.  How about the claustrophobic for a contrast?  perfectly fine people for the most part, with their normal range of quirks and dysfunctions and friendliness.  Nothing abnormal about them or how they interact with other people most of the time.  Put them into a small space and watch them melt down for no discernible reason.  And they can only seldom be purely talked down from it.

What about "imaginary friends," another thing common to young children?  I would say it's only as destructive as one put their dependency on it or take it to its extremes.  If other people are denied in favor of these mental constructs or causation of schizophrenic behavior or responsibility dissociation, then it would count as highly self-destructive; as a tool for imagination, self-encouragement, time-management (ever played Chess against yourself?), or even empathy, it is not unhealthy.  People continue to do it in modified measure throughout their life, even if they no longer recognize it as that or lay their reliance upon it.

As for the belief in God, what application of that belief is so destructive that necessitates the disbelief in God to work around it, that could not also be solved by removing an abuse of the belief?  By way of example, Creationism, which you probably would characterize as destructive.  Creationism requires belief in God, but belief in God doesn't require Creationism.  Shall we remove Darwin to get rid of the excesses and malicious behavior associated with Social Darwinism?

>>34
Not sure why you're elaborating on my point for me. Phobias are bad, yeah.

Imaginary friends as a tool of the imagination is not comparable to believing in God unless you insist that any imaginary friend you think up is objectively real, doesn't need proof to be believed in and tells you to do stuff.

I've already explained why belief in God is destructive without even needing to reference things like, you know, suicide bombings, the crusades, genital mutilation, the spread for HIV, torturing "witches", etc. The second part of your last paragraph doesn't make a lick of sense, you're going to have to rephrase.

>>35
If you're referring to
It is an irrational, self-destructive belief that sabotages your ability to relate accurately to the world around you. When you believe something that you have absolutely no evidence for as true you open your mind to all sorts of stupid shit, you set a precedent you cannot escape and crippled your ability for intellectual thought.
I was expecting something a little more profound than a blanket exaggeration statement.  Granted, it suits the level of argument common to this board.  Truth be told, I felt you missed every point I was trying to make about how these irrationalities are important aspects of the human psyche.  My contrasting claustrophobia with fear of darkness was to point out that even minor irrationalities do cause behavioral adjustments, but that they do not have to be the force that drives ones justifications for everything they do.  My "imaginary friends" monologue posited how an example of irrationality can fuel either a degenerate obsession or a healthy ego.  Unfortunately this means I'm either bad at making an argument prefaced with what I intend to accomplish, or you are proving your own point in that too great a belief in something destroys intellectual discussion.

I think the real issue is that you completely missed the point of my last paragraph and it's quite telling with how you responded to my discussion of "imaginary friends:" you are incapable of creating a distinction between belief in God and religious tenants.  Creationism is an application of "belief in God" that tries to turn God into the linchpin of the universe and thus its (the religion's) dogma, which alleges origin from God, are absolute.  Social Darwinism is an application of interpretation of the theory of natural selection turned into an observation of reality thus to argue that its sociopolitical methods, originating from observations about evolution, are absolute.  One is an exploitation of the other, and its the exploitation you addressed, perhaps justifiably, with loath and contempt: "...tells you to do stuff."  My argument, plainly, is that what you are fighting and what you are looking at, are two different things.

>>36
In addition, because I have to be clear, I brought Social Darwinism into the picture because The Origin of Species is attributing observations of the the physical world to a grand (barely self-managed?) system of physiological traits.  The concept of evolution has undergone a lot of changes since Darwin's time, but (has tried to remain) rooted in science.  Social Darwinism is an irrationality that grew from that scientific posit, a "tells you to do stuff" justification for behavior.  Even human intellectualism is not free from this kind of degeneration or having otherwise completely logic people believe the crock.  I believe it was a suitable mirror to God-as-an-origin dogma.