>>9
That scenario sounds more like an application of capitalistic consequences in lieu of another paradigm; however, the scenario is also quite realistic.
I think you'll find that utilitarianism is more exploitable than rationalism. Utilitarianism is the best course of action is the one that benefits the most people; pure utilitarianism sometimes disregards a smaller group harmed by the utilitarian choice, though smart ones may then step down and work out the problem they've created and create a smaller subclass. This is, in my opinion, degenerate. While its goal are equitable results for the most people, it can lead down detestable roads and into pitfalls that only non-utilitarian thought processes can escape, though it might be possible to argue that not pursuing the train of thought is in the best interests of the largest denomination. I find that when you've thought like that, you shouldn't have bothered in the first place, though. Sensible generosity is important.