>>44
Emacs is the worst of all that could have happened to the Lisp.
What?
Because of Emacs there are still no good editor written in the Common Lisp itself
There's nothing stopping anyone from writing a minimalist editor in Common Lisp. Or better yet, just take Emacs and hack away all the useless feature fluff.
so we have to deal with this C/C++ pile of shit.
C/C89 are rather solid languages. C++ is the pile of shit, even Stallman himself recognizes that C++ is shit.