>>2
Then howsabout that truth being the SINGULAR, ONLY EVER Truth that you can go to jail for failing to believe in?
Such is the way Europe's democracies defend the Truth™.
- Claim that the earth is flat, and they'll slap you over the head with evidence to the contrary while they laugh at you.
- Claim that earth is 6000 years old, and they'll slap you over the head with evidence to the contrary¹ while they laugh at you.
- They drag a murder suspect to court and you demand proof, and they'll either submit the evidence, or else fidget visibly and let the suspect go, as appropriate.
- But ask for actual evidence of the Holocaust (y'know, in _addition_ to the KZ camps it's supposed to have happened in), and suddenly you're a criminal. With a criminal record.
Not to mention you get to be a Jew-hating Nazi, totally regardless of whether you ever really were or not.
This is supposedly, somehow, infinitely better than the Nazis.
Even though I never found out exactly how.
¹ For some reason, people seem to miss the obvious argument; Sir DeadJewOnAStick kept preaching something called "humility", right? Well;
- Scenario A states that our world is a tiny speck of dust on a tiny speck of dust, and even here, humanity was only added very late, as a sort of random afterthought.
- Scenario B claims that us humans are the very reason the whole universe was created in the first place. Specifically for us to subdue and rule.
Which is more humble? Which is more arrogant?
Which is the Darwinist view? Which is the Creationist view?
Just saying.