Liberals, conservatives, commies, democrats, christians... well, there is a general pattern here. In fact, all these movements are the one.
Do you remember mathematics? Do you remember this annoying Theory of Sets? You should. You should also remember its three authors: Cantor, Zermelo and Frenkel - all three are Jewish. Basically Set Theory states that the Jews can use operator "all" for malformed, unreachable, undefined and unknown entities - i.e. Jews can talk about nonsense and look smart. For example, Set Theory allows the Jews to clone virtual oranges, made of "infinitesimals."
Same with these Jewish "liberal" political/religious movements. They state that ALL people are equal, ALL people are brothers, ALL people must be free and believe in some Jesus Christ. We have big lie, because there is no such thing as "ALL", without precise context, while without context "all" could mean anything.
I.e. "all" people can be "equal", being "free" slaves on a collective farm. Creeps and disabled are just executed for not being equal enough - exactly like Stalin did with wounded WWII veterans.
How Nazis are different? Nazis wont deny you your subjective idealism and wont force you to be equal to some "objective" standard. Nazis respect other individuals and nationalities right to not be equal and be free to choice their identification. Nazis respect private property and polytheism, while commies will state that your property belong to "all" and Christians will force you to worship evil Jewish God and a dead kike.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-09 18:50
>>200
Sure, bro. It can't be the usual Nazi spam since it involves proper spelling. LOL!
He is a living sophistry! In fact, you can learn most of the Jewish manners and speech patterns by just looking at him talking nonsense about non-existing math construct.
>>215
Georg Cantor was born in 1845 in St. Petersburg, Russia, where his father was a merchant. The father, Georg Waldemar Cantor, had Jewish parents. -- Loren Graham, Naming Infinity, p. 25
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-24 18:11
>>216
What do you think of set theory? That's not nonsense.
>>218
Have you ever seen zero? the pi that exists in a circle? an integral? a tesseract (not those interpretations where it's drawn incorrectly to work on a 2D surface; a real tesseract)? magnetic fields? the curvature of spacetime at the event horizon of a black hole?
Math is like that. It has been for a long time. The more approachable, mundane stuff has basic purposes and everyday applications, but a lot of it is designed to be able to describe things with which a physically-limited human can just barely interact or directly observe.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-24 23:19
>>219 Have you ever seen zero?
Computer memory consists of ones and zeroes. So I did.
the pi that exists in a circle? an integral?
Define "pi". And what is this "circle" with "integral"? You're talking nonsense again, Jew.
Math is like that.
Math is a pseudoscience. Hope it dies together with the Jews.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-24 23:36
Computer memory consists of ones and zeroes.
Technically, it consists of a series of on and off "gates" that regulate the flow of electrons thus that the said flow passes through an interpreter with a specific pattern. 1s and 0s is just a demonstration of that logic. As scientists are currently making strides in factoring in electron spin into the encoding, eventually the "1s and 0s" method may have to be modified to include more states, or half-states.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-25 0:12
>Math is a pseudoscience. Hope it dies together with the Jews.
And this is why we know know you're a retarded troll rather than a Nazi.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-25 5:59
>>218
Yes, infinite sets enable us to determine whether a computing loop will terminate or not.
>How Nazis are different? Nazis wont deny you your subjective idealism and wont force you to be equal to some "objective" standard. Nazis respect other individuals and nationalities right to not be equal and be free to choice their identification.
That's not exactly how it worked considering how Nazis also forced individuals of other nationalities and ethnic groups into standards and judged them upon those imposed standards (see: Jews, Slavs, etc.). Not only that, the whole "master race" ideal was also a collective standard imposed upon the German people by the pseudo-scientific community.
So, in practice, there's little difference between Communism and Nazism when it comes to enforcing these standards.
The sole difference is that Communism judged a single collective within the Communistic sphere, whereas Nazism judged numerous ethnic groups globally, whether they were within their sphere or not.
So no, Nazism isn't this bastion of individualism to frame it to be. It's still collectivist bullshit but with an ethnically based core.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-25 13:15
>>226 That's not exactly how it worked considering how Nazis also forced individuals of other nationalities and ethnic groups into standards and judged them upon those imposed standards (see: Jews, Slavs, etc.).
Because the Jews are parasites, who unlawfully gained control over Germany, so they have to be eliminated. Slavs didnt bothered Germans at all.
Nazism judged numerous ethnic groups globally, whether they were within their sphere or not.
What is wrong with that? Why cant we judge all Scientology followers globally?
So no, Nazism isn't this bastion of individualism to frame it to be.
There is no "individualism". Every person is born into some nation and has its subjective worldview.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-25 14:16
What is wrong with that? Why cant we judge all Scientology followers globally?
We can; the difference is the just don't kill them, or call for their killing, for not being able to satisfy that standard. (Those who do call for that, mind you, are also judged as falling short of the equitable standard.)
Every person is born into some nation and has its subjective worldview.
Only idiots accept everything blindly. "Are you an idiot or a Jew?"
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-25 14:20
>>228
Why cant we kill parasites, like rats or mosquitoes, Jew?
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-25 14:57
>>229
Technically, mosquitos are not parasites, but are saprophytes, and any risk of harm that comes from their bite is entirely unintentional. By comparison, a tapeworm is a parasite because its existence is at the complete expense of the host's ability to maintain nutrition and health. None of its harmful effects are unintentional.
The only time a mosquito sucks blood from another organism is when it is female and when it is pregnant; they use the extracted plasma to construct eggs, and die shortly later. At any other point in their life cycle, or if we just jump to the male example, an adult mosquito is a nectivore (consume nectar from flowers and other sugary sources) and as larva they are decomposers.
Let's not get started on the number of times you've ignored me talking in regards to the important food source they provided for a variety of insectivores.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-25 15:18
>>230 Technically, mosquitos are not parasites...
Shalom!
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-25 15:40
>>231
You know, I can turn my post >>230 into "mosquito spam" and we can duel honorably as shitposters, if you'd like. You took so well to the "Bacon!" approach someone else used.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-25 15:54
>>231
"Technically, mosquitos are are saprophytes, and any risk of harm that comes from their bite is entirely unintentional. By comparison, a tapeworm is a parasite because its existence is at the complete expense of the host's ability to maintain nutrition and health. None of its harmful effects are unintentional.
The only time a mosquito sucks blood from another organism is when it is female and when it is pregnant; they use the extracted plasma to construct eggs, and die shortly later. At any other point in their life cycle, or if we just jump to the male example, an adult mosquito is a nectivore (consume nectar from flowers and other sugary sources) and as larva they are decomposers.
Let's not get started on the number of times you've ignored me talking in regards to the important food source they provided for a variety of insectivores."
I've removed the offending line because it's obvious I have to account for your inherent mental deficiencies if I hope to have a semi-functional conversation.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-25 16:22
>>233
Well. A Jew could definitely pass for a tapeworn.
>>227
Slavs were treated less than dog shit under Nazi rule. You of all people should know that.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-27 16:46
>>235
Poles will disagree with you. Especially comparing Nazi rule to commie-Jew rule. In fact Judaism states that goyim souls are worse than dog souls...
Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, "Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is ill and suffering terribly." Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, "Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us." Jesus answered, "I was sent only to the Children of Israel." The woman came and knelt before him. "Lord, help me!" she said. Jesus replied, "It is wrong to take the jewish bread and toss it to the dogs." -- Matthew 15:21
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-27 19:34
>>236
“Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”
Then Jesus said to her, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.
- Matthew 21:27-28
Moral of the story: Jesus loved metaphors a lot.
Name:
Anonymous2012-08-27 19:45
>>237
Jesus was a heretic. An orthodox rabbi would have stopped Jesus, because by comparing a goyim to dogs, Jesus insulted dogs.
23 And Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon's porch.
24 Then came the Jews round about him, and said to him, How long do you make us to doubt? If you be the Christ, tell us plainly.
25 Jesus answered them, I told you, and you believed not: the works that I do in my Father's name, they bear witness of me.
26 But you believe not, because you are not of my sheep, as I said to you.