Socialism versus Capitalism, solved

As a democracy becomes larger and more complex voters rely increasingly on experts to figure out what is in their interest and for every expert there are 10 lobbyists posing as experts. As such there are limits to what can be decided "collectively" before corruption sets in, there is no fruit loop utopian vision that can simply wish away corruption and enable everything to be managed perfectly.

Thus it makes sense for socialists to think like capitalists, to recognise the limits of democracy and not overextend the limited administrative capital of voters, this would probably result in some kind of direct democratic system and strong local government taking care of welfare and public safety with otherwise unfettered capitalism everywhere else.

>>40
Let's say you're a baker and buying grain from a miller.
Everything goes nice, but then come the Jews. These Jewish brokers forces all country farmers to sell all their grain at a low price, and then, using this monopoly, forces all bakers to buy grain at a high price. The bread prices set a record in no time and people are now starving, while the filthy Jews are bathing in riches, calling simple people "bydlo" for not earning enough to buy a loaf of bread, and when somebody dies out of starvation the Jews say that it is the Law of Darwin and only the Jewish speculators will survive in the end.