Micro-Jews

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabe_Newell
Newell spent thirteen years working for Microsoft Corporation, ultimately becoming a "Microsoft Millionaire"
It is funny how quickly all Jews become millionaries, without any hard labor or innovations, selling a mediocre products. It is even funnier, that both FSF and Microsoft are being run by the Jews, and how all, that FSF does, only helps Microsoft in the end, which implies that both companies work towards common Jewish goal. And that, folks, isnt a conspiracy, that is a historic fact.

>>79
Does.

>The Jewish nation initially formed from various criminals and outcasts (like murderers and pedos)

You mean like every other culture on Earth? Man, you really need to notice other nations other than Israel. Talking to you is like talking to someone with Down's. You have 3 or 4 lines you respond with and a lot of copypasta.

Are you mentally disabled? You realize that Hitler had plans for people like you.

>>82
You mean like every other culture on Earth?
Nope. Mostly from Nigger, Kurdish and Arab criminals. Still the Jews frequently accept and interbreed with various criminals like gypsies, who are actually one of criminal tribes of India.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Tribes

>>83
Then you have Eurofag, Russians, Asian, Hispanics and white criminal gangs in their respective nations and cultures....none of which anything to do with Jewish ancestry. Arabs and niggers on the other hand, are a lot worse than all of the combined above.

Seriously, I can't take anything you say with a grain of salt. Are you even trying?

>>84
Then you have Eurofag, Russians, Asian, Hispanics and white criminal gangs in their respective nations and cultures
Never heard of such gangs. I doubt they did anything significant. Outside of Jewish mafia, Russians have various domestic crimes, when some drunkard gets delirium tremens and kill his wife, but we all know that vodka is a Jewish invention, while alcoholism was planted by the Jews.

>>85
Etymology of the word vodka, and production of the drink itself, is a slightly contested issue.  The word itself appears to be a form of the Slavic "voda" (water), but it's questioned whether the drink was first brewed in Russia (9th century) or in Poland (8th century) first.  Wikipedia actually has an accurate article on this, for once(?), so I won't bore you if you really don't care.  If you believe you have knowledge of the production of vodka that is not accounted historically, no matter how ridiculous I may find it, lay it on me.

Also, alcoholism and alcohol abuse in general is an incredibly ancient and complex social subject; I'd like to refute your silly claims but there's literally just too many ways I could approach this conversation that I am at a loss of something simple.  I suppose the nicest way of approaching this is saying that the Babylonians have surviving written texts regarding its dependency issues, and its abuse.

Never heard of such gangs.
Until I was twelve, I thought Turkmenistan was one of those silly countries TV made up to not unduly invoke actual Middle Eastern countries.  Who'd think that they were actually a  former republic of the Soviet Union and independent since 1991, you know?

>>85
>vodka is a Jewish invention
Oh I remember that one. It was one of the first of your logical fallacies I disproved with laughably simple logic. How did it go again? Jews, who you claim never farmed, somehow invented vodka and spread the idea to agricultural societies who had somehow not observed fermentation and not experimented with it using their own farmed produce.

And then you provided some wikipedia article that made a statement blaming the Jews, stating a reference that had absolutely no mention of Jews in it at all. Your explanation for this was that the source had been "scrubbed by the Jews". The Jews had somehow taken over control of an obscure website to clean it of evidence but didn't bother to change the reference to that "evidence" on the wikipedia article which anyone could edit. For some reason they took the most difficult route possible for the least reward.

Oh those were the days.

>>88
Oh I remember that one. It was one of the first of your logical fallacies I disproved with laughably simple logic.
You're imagining something, Jew.

How did it go again? Jews, who you claim never farmed, somehow invented vodka and spread the idea to agricultural societies who had somehow not observed fermentation and not experimented with it using their own farmed produce.
Some Jews farmed, but only to produce alcohol to advance usury and they used goyim labor. Typical Jewish business involved purchasing a large amount of grain and converting it into alcohol, which was used instead of money. All physical work was done by goyim, while the Jews just pointed what should be done. Regarding vodka, the Jews researched more potent beverages to make more slaves. Encyclopædia Britannica states the first Russian vodka was made in 14th century, brewed by the Krueger family, which later evolved into the company now known as Smirnoff.

Butthurt Nazi fags trying to rewrite history. lulz.

There is actually a strong connection between Jews and communism, not only in Russia but also in China and North Korea.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIuW-vNQsQI

Those who control the present controls the past.

>>90
Read Solzhenitsyn's book (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Hundred_Years_Together).

It is in the Jews' collective subconscious to make slaves out of all non-Jews. You must look at the real history of communism to understand this.

>It is in the Jews' collective subconscious

That isn't anything resembling a logical argument. You're losing points for that.

Communism is a beta fag mentality for left-wingers. It infects all ethnicities equally like a cancer. It is only rivaled by Islam in pure faggotry. It's a bit bigger than some Jew thing.

Still waiting for an adequate explanation as to how Jews can be pro-Capitalist and pro-Communist at the same exact moment. You can't claim that they own all the money by controlling all the banks but also want an economic system like communism.

I keep telling you, you can't have your cake AND eat it.

>>95
Communism is a single corporation capitalism. A total monopoly.

Perpetrators of communism wants capitalism for the elites and communism for the common people. You see this everywhere communism is established. It's quite ingenious. Utterly despicable but ingenious nonetheless. Have you watched the documentary I linked to?

>>96
>Communism is a single corporation capitalism.
You said this before, it didn't make sense then and it doesn't make sense now.

>>98
I will not speak for >>96 but I think he was trying to tell you what I'm telling in >>97. Different rules for them, another for the masses. It is not a surprise considering Talmudic Jews likens non-Jews to cattle, to be manipulated as they please. Again you must do your own research on communism, the bolshevik revolution and more importantly, who funded it.

>>99
I have done said research a long time ago when this absurd board spam began; but, I still remain unconvinced at a large portion of his widespread antisemitism because I can't find convincing arguments for enough of his arguments.  At one point, eugenics sounded like a good idea and a bunch of well-meaning people threw money into research that was actually horrendous in practice.  If you want to argue that a large swath of otherwise decent people were really really evil, that's fine for you; but, don't drag me into your definition, where I have to attribute to malice what can be explained by ignorance.  Additionally, I don't think I need more years of history courses to know that "communism rarely ever works as well in practice as it does in concept."

And what he's saying and what you said are two completely different things. "Communism is a single corporation capitalism" is a nonsense phrase; "different rules for them, another for the masses" makes much more sense since that's the basis of hypocrisy and that is very widely common in society, even down to an individual basis (even if the individual may not see it); but, that doesn't bridge the gap between the phrases.  I refuse to try and contrive sense on the basis of being presumptuous; it's his argument, not mine.  If he refuses to defend it in a comprehensive way, that's his prerogative.

Communism is a bit more than a economic model. It is a totalitarian state established in the name of the people so that everyone is equal. Naturally, it is a dictatorship in which the state owns the people and all of their possessions. You are a slave.

>>100
It's not that hard to synchronise what he said, which to you makes no sense, with what I said, which makes sense to you. Different syntax, but relatable semantics. In a single corporation capitalism, if one can imagine such a system, the owners of that corporation, the elites, can dictate anything and everything. And the workers of the corporation, the rest of the masses have no choice but to obey.

It is no accident that communism was invented by Jews. They achieve power through means of subterfuge and ruthless massacre. You cannot simply turn a blind eye to the sins of the Jews in the soviet. You cannot simply turn a blind eye to the tens and hundreds of millions of lives lost to the brutalities of these bloodthirsty Jews. You cannot simply turn a blind eye to the Jew bankers who funded the bolshevik revolution in the first place.

But no, instead you weep for the lost of six million non-existant Jews. I have no doubt that some level of Jewish extermination did in fact happened -- in war cruel things were done by all sides. You only hear the horrors perpetrated by the losers -- but not to the extent reported by these Jew propagandists.

>>102
I think the part I keep getting caught up about is how communism is capitalism in any kind of significant way.  In fact, a "single corporation capitalism" is only capitalism because that's what you're calling it; it's the furthest thing from being a form of capitalism unless you consider the "global market" and the country competing with other countries.  Even if you consider the global market, though, it's still communism.

If there's a concept of private ownership, it's necessarily stunted even in its pure form.  There's only the ghost of the spirit of competition.  Communism is based on the idea that overabundance and wealth is a natural consequence, while capitalism realistically allows that loss and failure are inevitabilities, but things that can always be bounced back from.

>>101
Ideally, communism strives to be stateless and I'd think that it would hope for an anarchy where anything requiring large-scale group approvals or deliberation is ubiquitous.  Regulation of any kind would be a natural consequence of some other people-less system, so that its existence could not be criticized or abused or abusive.  It'd be like the weather.

In practice, good luck ever getting that far.

I repeat, I suppose Jews could be capitalist and communist at the same time if you just invent your fictitious definitions. But, of course, anything goes when you can just make up whatever bullshit you feel like.

It's not about inventing your own definitions. It's about applying a different set of rules to others not within your group in order to manipulate and ultimately exploit them.

You seem to be stuck with syntax and semantics. Either that or you're not a very good agent of disinformation.

Communism was invented by Jews. The Bolshevik revolution was planned by Jews. The revolutionaries were mostly Jews, the financiers of the revolution were also Jews. The resulting dictatorship were filled with Jews in power. Lenin and Trotsky, both Jews, looted, exploited, and massacred millions of Russians.

But you don't get to hear any of that in the Jew-owned mainstream media.

You seem to be stuck with syntax and semantics.
You've only figured that out now?  What I'm stuck with are people who speak as if words were meaningless things you could string together in any fashion one wishes, or give them any kind of history, as long as it suits the argument.  That's what grinds my gears.

>Communism was invented by Jews.

Is it a house? Is it a boat? It's not a fucking object. It's an idea. The ideals that created Communism were hardly Jewish and have been around for a long time. Ideas belong to no one.

You don't back anything up, do you?

Marx was a Jew. >>108 can't into reading comprehension. The ideas of communism have been around for a long time, it's true. Even the early Christians can be stamped as somewhat communistic by today's standards. The fact that Marx was able to formulate it and made it into a manifesto which inspired the establishment of communism makes him, a Jew, the inventor of communism in my view.

>>106
>You seem to be stuck with syntax and semantics.
Unfortunately I limit myself to strings of words that actually make coherent sense. It adds a sort of consistency and reliability to words I find awfully helpful.

Also, lol, agent of disinformation. Have you invented your own definition for that as well or does it still refer to someone who denies historical events for which there is heaps of physical evidence for and supplements their own history for which there isn't a lick of proof for?

>Marx was a Jew

Was he a practicing Jew? If not then you don't have much of a point. I don't see any evidence that the Jewish religion or culture had anything to do with that political ideology.

If a Mexican came of with the idea of Scientology, does that make all Mexicans scientologists? No. That would be stupid.

Marx claimed to be an atheists. The vast majority of communists are in fact atheists. Communists see religion as a threat to their power. Your shit logic doesn't not add up.

>>111
Third Reich laws state that the Jew is anyone, who have a Jewish grandparent. Halakha state the Jew is anyone who has Jewish mother. So, by both, Nazi and Jewish laws, Karl Marx is Jewish.

>>111
I know your problem: You see the world in black and white. This is why you insist on labeling things as defined by a dictionary. You insist on everything and everyone being logical and consistent and in your world view, people tell it like it is. If only the real world is as orderly as you picture it. Human nature and motives are plenty shades of grey, where black and white overlaps. You are, at best, a naive.

To paraphrase: "Marx claimed to be an atheist, so he must be an atheist who despises all forms of religion. Therefore your logic is shit."

This assumes he was not lying; this assumes Zionist Jews such as himself identify with Judaism as a religion and not Jews as the "chosen race." The clues and evidence pointing to a conspiracy of many international Jews playing a major role in the greatest tragedy of the human race in the last century is staggering it would be stupid to ignore it.

Your puny "Mexican Scientologist" example only makes you, well, stupid.

>>113
>I know your problem: You see the world in black and white.
No, but declaring that someone thinks a certain way in order to attack how you declare they "might think is adorable. At best, you're pretty stupid.  

This is why you insist on labeling things as defined by a dictionary.
Words, then, don't mean anything. How very liberal of you. :)

>You insist on everything
Sure bro.

>his assumes he was not lying; this assumes Zionist Jews such as himself identify

Ok, bro. Here is the deal. You used the word naive so I guess I'll have to make a minor point. You make VAST assumptions and
assertion without offering and proof or evidence. You can't read minds or travel time, and yet you declare unprovable truths while attacking history itself. You declare conspiracies without evidence. Many things you assert are well beyond bullshit level.

>Your puny "Mexican Scientologist" example only makes you, well, stupid.

Oh really? How so? Do explain how if a guy of a certain ethnicity come up with an idea, that ideal becomes a genetic thing were all members of that ethnicity suddenly convert to that ideal secretly as part vast conspiracy that gives them magical mind control powers over anyone how uses this ideal and thus making them mental slaves to said ethnicity even if they never interact with each other....

Fuck, are you retarded? No really. Are you fucking retarded? You just won the Darwin award. Shit logic is still shit.

Have a nice day. :)

sure is JIDF in here

>>113
>You see the world in black and white
HAHA, OH WOW.

This is coming from someone who divides the world up into Jew and non-Jew, evil and good.

Your world view couldn't be any more black and white when you slam on endless assumptions about a person because their mother was Jewish. Shades of grey are totally fucking alien to you.

You may have a better grasp of English than your counterpart you've been drafted in to save but your logic is just as broken and your evidence just as absent.

>>117
Your world view couldn't be any more black and white when you slam on endless assumptions about a person because their mother was Jewish.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_is_a_Jew
According to halakha a Jew by birth must be born to a Jewish mother. Halakha states that the mere acceptance of the principles and practices of Judaism does not make a person a Jew. However, those born Jewish do not lose that status because they cease to be observant Jews, even if they adopt the practices of another religion.

>>118
I.e. even if some Jew call himself atheist or communist, he is still a Jew. Once a Jew - always a Jew.

>>118
>>119
Okay? Thanks for proving my point. You make no distinction between the most orthodox of Jew and someone who has a Jewish ancestor in a family who hasn't given a fuck about religion for 10 generations.

Jew or not Jew, black and white is your world view.