Micro-Jews

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabe_Newell
Newell spent thirteen years working for Microsoft Corporation, ultimately becoming a "Microsoft Millionaire"
It is funny how quickly all Jews become millionaries, without any hard labor or innovations, selling a mediocre products. It is even funnier, that both FSF and Microsoft are being run by the Jews, and how all, that FSF does, only helps Microsoft in the end, which implies that both companies work towards common Jewish goal. And that, folks, isnt a conspiracy, that is a historic fact.

So we can add computers and video games to the list of things you consider Jewish.

>>1
Implication is not historic fact.  If anything, that would make it a arithmetic conditional, which has to be user defined.

>>3
We have FSF.
We have Microsoft.
We have actions of FSF, which helped Microsoft eliminating emerging competitors.

We have facts, Jew.

IIRC, Jews call it "dumping". Jews also practice it in other contexts. For example, a Jewish music teacher will try to sink best goyim students, while helping mediocre Jewish students. A good example would be Hitler, whom Jewish teacher expelled from art school, because Hitler was good enough to be a treat for Jewish students. So for Hitler antisemitism was very personal.

>>2
It depends who owns companies, which produce them. Before buying a hardware or software, make sure company owner is goy. If you have no choice, then start preparing revolution.

>>4
More like you're stuttering "Jew" over and over. According to you, every single persona on Earth, without exception, is a Jew. In fact, I don't think you've even explain how that works.

Are you mentally ill. perhaps?

>>6
Only the Jews and the idiots defend the Jews. Are you a Jew or an idiot?

>>6
His method of thinking isn't that exotic: "if you don't agree with me, you must be a Jew."  In theory, he's trying to convince us of his position ("in theory," I said); but, this way, he can disregard anyone who doesn't believe as the ethnicity he hates and, therefore, it doesn't matter to him what they say.

That's, of course, assuming this is not a massive level of trolling.

>>8
Only the Jews and the idiots defend the Jews. Are you a Jew or an idiot?

>Only the Jews and the idiots defend the Jews. Are you a Jew or an idiot?

You realize that your naive ignorant assumptions do not reflect reality or your honesty, do you not? The childishness nature of your statements do not even invoke a reaction in me other than disappointment.

I can easily forgive your romantic views of Nazis and genocidal hate of others. To hate is to be alive and war is a beautiful thing. This is man's true nature.

What I can't forgive is that you are a failure to your own ideals. The Nazis would be embarrassed by you. You scream from the safety of the net like a coward. You do not act on your beliefs. The Jews don't even notice your childish lies or insults. You are no threat even as a propagandists.

Nazis did not silently wish for the deaths of those that were beneath them. The conquered and massacred their victims without regret, pity or apology. You insult what they were by being the pussy you are.

>>4
>We have facts, Jew.
Haha, oh wow. No, facts are the one thing you don't have. You sully the good name of factual, demonstrable evidence by even attempting to associate yourself with it.

>>10>>11
Shalom, kike!

>>12
Oh look, I can do that too. Heil Hilter, Nazi! I totally just invalided your argument, if you had one.

>>13
The difference is that the Nazis are noble heroes of Germany, while calling someone a "Jew" is the worst insult (at least in East Europe). You probably know, that after 1917, commie Jews themselves banned the word "Jew' (Жид) in Russia, introducing a new word "Hebrew" (Ebrew/Еврей) int its place. All new printing especially censured to remove any reference to the old word "Jew". That is because old word became associated with all the evil, unclean and immoral of our world, and the Jews tried to clean themselves of filth for the new evils.

>>14
What are you talking about?  The word "Hebrew" is a portmanteau of Ancient Greek and Latin words; it comes from a reading of the Torah/Old Testament word "Ivri" (plural: Ivrim, Ibrim) which means to traverse.  During the Roman Empire the word Hebraios was used to indicate general Jewish ethnicity, usually via use of the language but with various degrees of specification depending on the context.

>>15
AFAIK, "Hebrew" is Italian:
http://translate.google.com/#en|it|jew

We, Eastern Europeans, always called Jews just Jews/Yids/Judeans, because Roman culture is foreign to us.

>>16
Oh Jesus Christ. That's your evidence? You are so retarded it's unbelievable.

>>17
http://books.google.ru/books?id=a3JaVKBbx9oC&pg=PA114&lpg=PA114&dq=russian+ban+on+the+word+yid&source=bl&ots=qVrabViZXl&sig=wbVnXBKeEiL-uHhLHjrkRcf8pyw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=aAUCUJiCCsS5hAfl1430Bw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Similar action was taken in The Quiet Don. During the preparation of its 1953 version, the pejorative "yid" and its derivatives were omitted or replaced

etc..

>>17
Jesus Christ
Are you a fanboy of a kike on a stick?

>>19
He is still cooler than you, bro. He has so many friends and you have no bacon. LOL!

>>20
Go suck another Jewish dick, shabbos goy, and worship a kike God.

>>18
The censors of the revised 1953 version of The Quiet Don were apparently concerned that the large number of foreigners serving in the Red forces during the Civil War might indicate less than enthusiastic support for the Bolshevik cause by the majority of Russians.
And the book goes onto explaining various other changes made to accommodate the propagandizing of The Quiet Don, many of which do not involve Jewish references.  One even suggest the weakening of - what I can only assume is - a curse slung against Russians by an antagonistic character.  Singling out the Jewish contribution to this change doesn't really indicate anything more significant than just what is written.  That the 1953 release of The Quiet Don was heavily edited for the sake of nationalism and, while most of it can be consider valid, instance words have been shuffled around.  Much like how characters in movies can exclaim "Jesus Christ!" but on TV the same character says "Buddhist Priest!"

And that's not really not saying much.  Censorship in books has always been a fairly touchy subject, but one that has always been attempted.  Looks at Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and all subsequent struggles to present the character of Jim, or Catcher in the Rye and its typical opposition.

Don't get me wrong; this is good step forward.  You're referencing evidence to your argument, with proper sourcing.

>>22
That the 1953 release of The Quiet Don was heavily edited for the sake of nationalism
Having nationalism in USSR is like having antisemitism in Israel. Especially under Georgian criminal, like Stalin, with ton of Jews as his generals. Commie Jews just wanted to hide that so little of local population supported them, that they had to employ foreign mercenaries.

Jewish ancestry of Lenin was also censured for some strange reason, even when Lenin himself was most proud of it. Still some soviet writers openly recognized that communism is purely Jewish...

We cry a lot, too much we moan,
But Jewish people came through fire,
No wonder the word "Jew" is always synonymous with
The holy and noble word "communist".
  -- Margarita Aliger

>>23
I'm afraid you need to identify the "local population" for me.  As far as I'm aware, everyone who has ever done anything noteworthy is Jewish, or controlled by the Jewish, or manipulated by the Jewish, or somehow the Jewish are responsible for it, its opposition, or both at the same time, according to you.  I need clarification that you believe there is at least one non-Jew-linked person in this world, excluding yourself (that would be conceited).  Is there any historical event that wasn't a part of some Jewish-linked plot?

>>23
IIRC, soviet commies were so anti-nationalist, that they got into quarrel even with Zionist Jews (their main beneficiaries), refusing them their nationality. Both Lenin and Stalin mention that nationalities are a remnant of the past and there will be only one nationality - communist. That is why Stalin had to eliminate some commie leaders, who also supported Zionism.

>>24
I'm afraid you need to identify the "local population" for me.
"local population" - Slavs. Excluding various criminals, like Nestor Machno, who was more like separatist and for some stupid reason wanted Ukrainian independence.

And apparently there's no logical contradiction in Jews being economically capitalist and communist at the exact same time.

>>27
I wasn't going to bring up the elephant in the room because I was concerned about how much of reality would break in him trying to answer it.

Whatever.  You've asked it now.

>>27
there's no logical contradiction in Jews being economically capitalist and communist at the exact same time.
Communism is a single company capitalism. Consider a capitalist company, ruled by some Jewish financial family, which achieved total monopoly, purchasing even government officials and army. That would be the communism.

Communism is a single company capitalism.
wat.

Consider a capitalist company, ruled by some Jewish financial family, which achieved total monopoly, purchasing even government officials and army.
Because there are so many instances of a corporate dystopia (cyberpunk or otherwise) these days, Ayn Rand is just rolling over in her grave, right?  Alright.  I'll consider it. ... Now I'm waiting for it to come into existence.  But just talking about it doesn't make it happen; and, it hasn't happened.  Monopolies exist and break apart and, for a large part, pretty much only care about what they do.  Companies and non-profits both lobby politicians, one with money, one with conscience. 

The oil industry - for example - because it gets a lot of flak for just existing - is as profitable as it is today because people are not yet confident enough about ulterior power sources and the current power sources remain incredibly reliable, not because some shady backdoor misers congregated at some point in the past.

>>30
Even U.S. propaganda depicted USSR as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acme_Corporation

>>29
>Communism is a single company capitalism.
Double what?

>Consider a capitalist company, ruled by some Jewish financial family, which achieved total monopoly, purchasing even government officials and army. That would be the communism.
That's not... That's not communism.

>>32
That is. Communism stands for a total Jewish monopoly. Thus U.S. got pretty close to communism, especially after 9/11. I think most major U.S. capital ownership could be traced to Jewish agents, either open or through proxy.

I suppose Jews can be capitalist and communist if you just invent your own fictitious definitions for the words.

>>34
Well, when Jews "believe" in whatever a butthurt eurofags Nazi thinks, the meaning of words don't matter in the first place.

>>35
Did you just call yourself Jewish?

>>34
Look at North Korea. It has ideal communism. The ruling families have absolute power and bath in luxuries, while the simple Koreans are more like mindless cattle. The only problem is that the ruling families are not Jewish, as was originally intended.


Still the Jewish goal was reached - Korea was divided and killed as a country, remaining in a state of permanent civil war. Similar situation could have happened to Germany. But Germans always manage to somehow repair their country back.

>Look at North Korea.

The natural conclusion to socialism. Are you saying the lack of Jews is why it's so bad? That is very nice of you. 

>Still the Jewish goal was reached

To avoid living near or having anything to do with North Korea? Jews actually had nothing to do with North Korea at any level.


Sorry dude, but you're making a retarded argument that actually proves you are mentally ill. Not even real Nazis would make such an outlandish claim. Damn, son....your intellect is shitty even for a troll.

>>38
The natural conclusion to socialism.
I.e. the communism.

Are you saying the lack of Jews is why it's so bad? That is very nice of you. 
Exactly the opposite. Had Nazis killed all the Jews in WWII, there would be no communism in Korea.

To avoid living near or having anything to do with North Korea?
To divide Korea in half, making stupid goyim fight each other.

Jews actually had nothing to do with North Korea at any level.
Then who organized and funded Korean revolution?

>Exactly the opposite. Had Nazis killed all the Jews in WWII, there would be no communism in Korea.

So you really are not a real Nazi. You are just a idiot who hates history books or something. Ok, officially you aren't using real Earth history or any kind of logic here.. You might as well blame aliens because no one with half a brain is going to even buy your obvious made up bullshit.

Clearly, you hate bacon.