>>23
Read peer-reviewed publications and journals on the matter (pointless, because I know you won't), reading articles about it on Wikipedia barely scratch the surface of understanding it all. Plus, Wikipedia can be unreliable since anyone can edit it.
Sorry, but today science has many times already discredited itself.
"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow — even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!" -- McKitrick and Michaels (2004)
Comparing one book (which by reading the article seems to be a discredited work, I haven't read it myself (this is my first of hearing of it), but it's probably bullshit) to an entire system of thought in the former Soviet Union?
Niggers won't care if it discredited or not. It's an ideology book, which produces "an entire system of thought". The process has began.
I never said that "eugenics is irrational". I said your bullshit line of though is.
What my "line of though" is? Are you supposing, that multicultural society, like U.S. or Russian, is in any way better than monoethnic ones, like Japan? Dare to prove?
Family support programs are in place in many industrialized countries (I'm not sure exactly how that's setup in Japan) and there are numerous tax benefits for married couples and families.
They aren't radical enough. You should penalize selfish 1-kiddie families - i.e. make it unprofitable for them, to have less than 2 kids. But no, liberal Jews will say it violates Human Rights (tm)!