>>34
You know it's impossible to disagree with that speech, since money
in the form that Rand describes it (in the form I thought of it when I was 11 years old) is just a neutral tool of exchange.
The only problem is that in the real world money became something completely different - I think we should have more kinds of money - the money described by Rand and the
game money used for stock speculation double-deriving/insuring and so on - kinda like gold/gp in your game of choice - that way the people that
work could work and one day say: 'fuck the system of inflationary "gain' above our heads" and make the exponentially growing overhead of inflated funds moot in an instance.
But since we have a single concept of money for both working and speculating with - one can only derive that the monetary system is definitely a fucked up concept to say the least.