A cancer-stricken pensioner died after being attacked in hospital by an illegal immigrant who was in the bed next to him.
Anthony Wilson was throttled by the Iranian man four days after an operation to remove part of his bowel.
The 78-year-old, who had been battling cancer for three months, was asleep when he was assaulted by the immigrant, who had been brought into the hospital two days earlier complaining of breathing difficulties.
>>1
>unprovoked attack
So somehow, a hospitalised man managed to get out to bed and strangle the person next to him for no reason what so ever despite there being three people in the building whose job it was to watch him?
>dailymail
Oh wait, never mind. It's probably fictitious.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-30 17:09
This is why the NHS is skint, Treating half the world before our own.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-30 18:11
>>2 >>4 apologising for criminals just because they are ethnic minorities
stay classy liberals
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-30 20:51
just because they are ethnic minorities
[citation needed]
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-30 21:32
>>7 TABLOIDS CONSIDERED HARMFUL It's probably fictitious.
[citation needed]
[liberals don't like daily mail, posters 2 and 4 are likely to be liberal]
[liberals insist on placing violent illegal immigrant among vulnerable people and this is an instance where the drawbacks of this stance are clear]
[logical to assume this cognitive dissonance is the source of the hissy fit shown in posts 2 and 4]
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-30 22:23
So being sceptical of rather suspicious reporting on unexplained events by a news vendor that is well known to be obscenely biased makes me a dirty liberal does it? Okay, so be it. But what does that do to address any of the valid concerns raised?
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-30 23:42
logical to assume
There it is. Your entire political ideology summed up. Why bother with facts and actual research when you can just make assumptions? After all if they sound logical they must be true. It explains so much about you. Really it does.
Name:
Anonymous2011-10-31 3:54
>>10
So why did you say these things then? TABLOIDS CONSIDERED HARMFUL It's probably fictitious.
It is logical to assume you are a liberal, there is a small chance you are not but I'd just be a sucker to think so.
Liberals insist on treating illegal immigrants as equals and this has resulted in a violent criminal being placed among vulnerable people in a hospital, the criminal the proceeded to throttle a cancer patient which may have resulted in complications leading to his death and you're pretending this didn't happen.
>>12
>How did this got to be a "liberal" argument?
Because that's the only way daily mail readers can distract from all the things that don't add up in this story lest it be revealed that they are pushing their agenda falsely.
OP's article isn't a complete fabrication, it is at least based on a real event.
Name:
Anonymous2011-11-02 11:45
based on a real event
That doesn't really count for much if they're omitting important details. Hell, 9/11 truther documentaries are based on real events too. That doesn't make them legitimate.
The posters here assume that being called a "liberal" is some kind of epithet. I'm pro-immigration, but I want to reform the system so illegal immigrants are better able to come to the country legally. Labour and most of the Lib Dems are not interested in doing so, so I would recommend not voting for these parties on that issue alone. The Daily Mail is considered harmful because not only is it a mouthpiece for the Tories, but like all tabloids, it relies on sensationalist news to make sales. Look up the term "Yellow Journalism", you'll see that the Daily Mail is a wonderful modern example of such.