Osama, Awlaki and now Gaddafi?

I was beginning to think we were losing the war on teror and we should pull out but it seems a left wing negro hippy can do a better job than a gun toting neocon. Maybe I should vote for this darky come 2012.

You should, cause hes going to kill you next.

>>2 barack obama.

If the war on terror is the issue that your primarily voting on, then you should vote for Obama.  The Busg administrations method of launching massive invasions of countries that support terrorism just spread our resources thin and make no sense when organisations like Al Qaeda are international in nature.  Obama has done a much better job of cooperating with the UN, supporting internal national movements (like in Libya), and haveing the CIA and special forces kill terrorists instead of huge armies.  I've met numerous people who don't give Obama credit for this and say its no the President that makes these decisions, but Obama has definitely pushed a new strateg and is largely responsible for these recent successes.

Remember when Obama was against the war on terror, before he banned the phrase, and later, decided to attack dictators to help himself get reelected?

Obama = Bush

>>5
Obama get's things done

Obama>Bush

Awlaki and his 16 year old son were an illegal assassination. They posed no immediate threat and were US citizens, they had the right to a fair trial.

A younger man more competent than a borderline retarded older man at having old terrorists killed? What a shocker.

>>5

No, Obama = everything that Bush was cracked up to be, but wasn't.

Hopefully Obama targets Karl Rove next, since he's so good at taking out terrorists.

>>7
They were ungrateful pricks who were plotting against their homeland.

Why should we Risk US lives to capture them?

>>10
And you remind America that liberals are some of the most intolerant nazis on the planet. 

Killing political enemies? How very Islamic!