Anarchy

Can anyone give a coherent explanation as to why anarchy is apparently the solution to all the current systems?

I understand why anarchy might be attractive in that the individual is ultimately free of such thing as rule of law and therefore local as well as centralized government but there exists a major problem with anarchy: bandits. Bandits appear to be the downfall of anarchy in that they will fuck you in the ass until you get organized, delegate some duties to others in the organisation and form a... governing body of some kind with a branch that enforces good morals... and you see where the problem is.

And no, this thread is not an excuse to go on about why you think capitalism or socialism or communism has failed, I want to explore the possibility that there might actually be something I hadn't considered and anarchists aren't just in it because going smashy-smashy on private property is fun.

>>37
Sorry, what's extortion?
Google

But what are you comparing it? What workable alternative do you propose? Have you considered that the "evils" of a state is the greatest lesser evil?

Its maybe the greatest lesser evil to you but to me its not. What is evil? Evil may mean something to you and something different to me. That's why i advocate for different stateless societies so people with similar interpretations or beliefs can get together and form societies from the ground up, compared from the top down as the 13 Colonies and other modern societies did. Now the specific type of system i would subscribe to would be a society with a true free market because i believe its the best way to bring wealth and prosperity to a society. Other people might think markets are "exploitative" and would want more of a communal type of society and that's fine too. Now there are many ideas on how this may develop after statism truly dies but i think that people of different "property beliefs" will live FAR away from each other to avoid potential conflict.(People who believe in Private property/ People who believe in communal property or no property at all.)

Now you can still have something similar to the U.S. in a stateless society the only difference is that it would be smaller in scale and scope and you wouldn't have to worry that much about "politics" anymore.