Anarchy

Can anyone give a coherent explanation as to why anarchy is apparently the solution to all the current systems?

I understand why anarchy might be attractive in that the individual is ultimately free of such thing as rule of law and therefore local as well as centralized government but there exists a major problem with anarchy: bandits. Bandits appear to be the downfall of anarchy in that they will fuck you in the ass until you get organized, delegate some duties to others in the organisation and form a... governing body of some kind with a branch that enforces good morals... and you see where the problem is.

And no, this thread is not an excuse to go on about why you think capitalism or socialism or communism has failed, I want to explore the possibility that there might actually be something I hadn't considered and anarchists aren't just in it because going smashy-smashy on private property is fun.

>>18
Ignoring the silly rhetoric at the end, what you're saying is that only people who vote for a leader are lead by them. How exactly does this work in a community, say in a city? I mean, does the entire city some together to vote on an unlimited number of potential leaders? And once the leaders are decided, how is it decided who has authority over which resources and such? I'm assuming that the answer is that they just somehow, peacefully work it out between themselves and pray no one disagrees enough to stall the entire process.