>>23
The majority of the population voted for the Nazi Party, or the DNP which was in support of Hitler. After Hitler seized power the majority, 75% of the population, supported him fully, though most believed the other parts of the government to have substantial corruption. Despite the widespread belief that the other parts of the government were corrupt, the Fuhrer was seen as acting in the nation's best interests and being personally non-corrupt, so his government was tolerated.
Of course the socialists were pissed off, but they were a minority. A minority of any large population is always dissatisfied with the government.
Would the socialists have been better at governing Germany? Maybe, maybe not. If they did come to power WWII might not have happened, or would have happened at a later date with different sides (Socialist vs non-Socialist), and Germany would have kept all of it's territory (though the Nazis could have stopped at Poland, only taking the pre-WWI territory now a part of Poland leaving Poland land-locked, and evading WWII while having a much larger, much more powerful, Germany and allowing Fascism and Imperialism to exist into the modern day [and the glorious British Empire would still be top dog]).